Literature DB >> 9829161

Urapidil. A reappraisal of its use in the management of hypertension.

M Dooley1, K L Goa.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Urapidil is a peripheral postsynaptic alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist with central agonistic action at serotonin 5-HT1A receptors. It reduces blood pressure by decreasing peripheral vascular resistance. Oral urapidil decreases blood pressure in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension and associated risk factors such as hyperlipidaemia or type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus with no effect on heart rate. The antihypertensive efficacy of urapidil is similar to that of most comparators in patients with mild to moderate essential or secondary hypertension and no concomitant risk factors. However, the antihypertensive efficacy of urapidil was lower than that of hydrochlorothiazide in a well designed trial. Lipid levels and glucose metabolism are not adversely affected and may improve with urapidil in patients with lipid or glucose abnormalities. Urapidil can be safely combined with other antihypertensive agents such as hydrochlorothiazide and nifedipine and improves blood pressure control in previous nonresponders to monotherapy. Intravenous urapidil reduces blood pressure in patients with pre-eclampsia or hypertension in pregnancy and in patients with hypertensive crises or peri- or postoperative hypertension. The decrease in blood pressure is similar to that observed after nifedipine, enalaprilat, sodium nitroprusside and dihydralazine, greater than that of ketanserin according to 1 larger study, and greater than that of sublingual nitroglycerin in 1 trial in patients with nonsurgical hypertensive crises and pulmonary oedema. However, more patients responded to treatment with urapidil than with enalaprilat or nifedipine. Heart rate is less likely to be altered by urapidil than with some comparator drugs. Urapidil appears to be well tolerated, with most adverse events being mild and transient. The incidence of adverse events with urapidil is similar to that with prazosin, metoprolol, atenolol, sodium nitroprusside and hydrochlorothiazide and less than that with nifedipine and clonidine. Urapidil may not be as well tolerated as captopril and, in 1 study, more urapidil than nitrendipine recipients discontinued treatment because of adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: urapidil reduces blood pressure without altering heart rate. The oral formulation is an effective choice in patients with hypertension and concomitant dyslipidaemia or type 2 diabetes mellitus, in whom the drug does not adversely affect and may improve lipid profiles and glucose metabolism. The intravenous formulation is effective in controlling various hypertensive crises and hypertension associated with pregnancy or surgery and is similar to or better than other first-line agents used in these conditions. Thus, urapidil may be a useful alternative to currently available antihypertensive agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9829161     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-199856050-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  36 in total

1.  Favourable haemodynamic effects of a new multifactorial antihypertensive on left ventricular dimension, wall thickness and function in hypertensive patients.

Authors:  I Sheiban; E Arosio; S Tonni; G Montresor; F Priante; A Lechi
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Antihypertensive efficacy of urapidil versus hydrochlorothiazide alone in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension and of their combination in nonresponders to monotherapy.

Authors:  R Fariello; C Dal Palu; A Pessina; A Semplicini; A Pirrelli; V Vulpis; R Carretta; G Bellini; R Buoninconti; W Wurst
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  A randomized multicenter double-blind comparison of urapidil and ketanserin in hypertensive patients after coronary artery surgery.

Authors:  J G van der Stroom; H B van Wezel; J J Langemeijer; H H Korsten; J Kooyman; P J van der Starre; J E Kal; M Porsius; R van den Ende; P A van Zwieten
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.628

4.  The 1996 report of a World Health Organization expert committee on hypertension control.

Authors:  J Chalmers; A Zanchetti
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.844

5.  The nitura study--effect of nitroglycerin or urapidil on hemodynamic, metabolic and respiratory parameters in hypertensive patients with pulmonary edema.

Authors:  W Schreiber; C Woisetschläger; M Binder; A Kaff; H Raab; M M Hirschl
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  1993 guidelines for the management of mild hypertension: memorandum from a WHO/ISH meeting.

Authors: 
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.408

7.  Acute effects of urapidil on left ventricular function in hypertensive patients: comparison with clonidine using radionuclide angiography.

Authors:  J Y Lepage; M Pinaud; J Hélias; J M Malinovsky; A Cozian; A Petitet; R Souron
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Addition of urapidil or metoprolol to the treatment of hypertensive non-responders to nifedipine monotherapy: efficacy and metabolic effects. Italian Urapidil Study Group.

Authors:  A Zanchetti
Journal:  Blood Press Suppl       Date:  1995

9.  Intravenous urapidil versus sublingual nifedipine in the treatment of hypertensive urgencies.

Authors:  M M Hirschl; D Seidler; A Zeiner; A Wagner; G Heinz; F Sterz; A N Laggner
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.469

10.  The influence of ketanserin or urapidil on haemodynamics, stress response and kidney function during operations for myocardial revascularisation.

Authors:  A Petry; H Wulf; M Baumgärtel
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.955

View more
  10 in total

1.  Differential effects of urapidil and doxazosin on heart rate.

Authors:  Kurt Stoschitzky; Gergana Stoschitzky; Manfred Wonisch; Helmut Brussee
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 2.  Adverse drug reactions in patients with phaeochromocytoma: incidence, prevention and management.

Authors:  Graeme Eisenhofer; Graham Rivers; Alejandro L Rosas; Zena Quezado; William M Manger; Karel Pacak
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Severe hypertension in children and adolescents: pathophysiology and treatment.

Authors:  Joseph T Flynn; Kjell Tullus
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 3.714

4.  Chronomodulated drug delivery system of urapidil for the treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  Sona S Chaudhary; Hetal K Patel; Punit B Parejiya; Pragna K Shelat
Journal:  Int J Pharm Investig       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

5.  Control of hypertension in the critically ill: a pathophysiological approach.

Authors:  Diamantino Ribeiro Salgado; Eliezer Silva; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 6.925

Review 6.  Optimal perioperative management of arterial blood pressure.

Authors:  Laurent Lonjaret; Olivier Lairez; Vincent Minville; Thomas Geeraerts
Journal:  Integr Blood Press Control       Date:  2014-09-12

Review 7.  Anesthetic considerations on adrenal gland surgery.

Authors:  Rudin Domi; Hektor Sula; Myzafer Kaci; Sokol Paparisto; Artan Bodeci; Astrit Xhemali
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2014-10-16

Review 8.  Management of Blood Pressure During and After Recanalization Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Vitt; Michael Trillanes; J Claude Hemphill
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  Peri-operative management of pheochromocytoma with intravenous urapidil to prevent hemodynamic instability: A 17-year experience.

Authors:  Patrick Tauzin-Fin; Kévin Barrucand; Musa Sesay; Stéphanie Roullet; Philippe Gosse; Jean-Christophe Bernhard; Gregoire Robert; François Sztark
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-02-18

10.  Retrospective analysis of risk factors of hypotensive bradycardic events during shoulder arthroscopic surgery under interscalene blockade in the sitting position.

Authors:  Taeha Ryu; Baek Jin Kim; Seong Jun Woo; So Young Lee; Jung A Lim; Sang Gyu Kwak; Woon Seok Roh
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-03-27
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.