Literature DB >> 9827775

Dynamic cortical involvement in implicit and explicit motor sequence learning. A PET study.

M Honda1, M P Deiber, V Ibáñez, A Pascual-Leone, P Zhuang, M Hallett.   

Abstract

We examined the dynamic involvement of different brain regions in implicit and explicit motor sequence learning using PET. In a serial reaction time task, subjects pressed each of four buttons with a different finger of the right hand in response to a visually presented number. Test sessions consisted of 10 cycles of the same 10-item sequence. The effects of explicit and implicit learning were assessed separately using a different behavioural parameter for each type of learning: correct recall of the test sequence for explicit learning and improvement of reaction time before the successful recall of any component of the test sequence for implicit learning. Regional cerebral blood flow was measured repeatedly during the task, and a parametric analysis was performed to identify brain regions in which activity was significantly correlated with subjects' performances: i.e. with correct recall of the test sequence or with reaction time. Explicit learning, shown as a positive correlation with the correct recall of the sequence, was associated with increased activity in the posterior parietal cortex, precuneus and premotor cortex bilaterally, also in the supplementary motor area (SMA) predominantly in the left anterior part, left thalamus, and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. In contrast, the reaction time showed a different pattern of correlation during different learning phases. During the implicit learning phase, when the subjects were not aware of the sequence, improvement of the reaction time was associated with increased activity in the contralateral primary sensorimotor cortex (SM1). During the explicit learning phase, the reaction time was significantly correlated with activity in a part of the frontoparietal network. During the post-learning phase, when the subjects achieved all components of the sequence explicitly, the reaction time was correlated with the activity in the ipsilateral SM1 and posterior part of the SMA. These results show that different sets of cortical regions are dynamically involved in implicit and explicit motor sequence learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9827775     DOI: 10.1093/brain/121.11.2159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  102 in total

1.  Functional networks in motor sequence learning: abnormal topographies in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  T Nakamura; M F Ghilardi; M Mentis; V Dhawan; M Fukuda; A Hacking; J R Moeller; C Ghez; D Eidelberg
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Striatum forever, despite sequence learning variability: a random effect analysis of PET data.

Authors:  P Peigneux; P Maquet; T Meulemans; A Destrebecqz; S Laureys; C Degueldre; G Delfiore; J Aerts; A Luxen; G Franck; M Van der Linden; A Cleeremans
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Cluster analysis of activity-time series in motor learning.

Authors:  Daniela Balslev; Finn A Nielsen; Sally A Frutiger; John J Sidtis; Torben B Christiansen; Claus Svarer; Stephen C Strother; David A Rottenberg; Lars K Hansen; Olaf B Paulson; I Law
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  The differential role of premotor frontal cortex and basal ganglia in motor sequence learning: evidence from focal basal ganglia lesions.

Authors:  Cornelia Exner; Janka Koschack; Eva Irle
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 5.  Neuroplasticity subserving motor skill learning.

Authors:  Eran Dayan; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Dissociation between priming and recognition in the expression of sequential knowledge.

Authors:  David R Shanks; Pierre Perruchet
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

Review 7.  Brain mechanisms for the formation of new movements during learning: the evolution of classical concepts.

Authors:  M E Ioffe
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-01

8.  Interleaved practice enhances skill learning and the functional connectivity of fronto-parietal networks.

Authors:  Chien-Ho Janice Lin; Ming-Chang Chiang; Barbara J Knowlton; Marco Iacoboni; Parima Udompholkul; Allan D Wu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 9.  The many facets of motor learning and their relevance for Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Lucio Marinelli; Angelo Quartarone; Mark Hallett; Giuseppe Frazzitta; Maria Felice Ghilardi
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-04-09       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Modulating human procedural learning by cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Roberta Ferrucci; Andre R Brunoni; Marta Parazzini; Maurizio Vergari; Elena Rossi; Manuela Fumagalli; Francesca Mameli; Manuela Rosa; Gaia Giannicola; Stefano Zago; Alberto Priori
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.847

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.