Literature DB >> 9825526

Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: the negativity bias in evaluative categorizations.

T A Ito1, J T Larsen, N K Smith, J T Cacioppo.   

Abstract

Negative information tends to influence evaluations more strongly than comparably extreme positive information. To test whether this negativity bias operates at the evaluative categorization stage, the authors recorded event-related brain potentials (ERPs), which are more sensitive to the evaluative categorization than the response output stage, as participants viewed positive, negative, and neutral pictures. Results revealed larger amplitude late positive brain potentials during the evaluative categorization of (a) positive and negative stimuli as compared with neutral stimuli and (b) negative as compared with positive stimuli, even though both were equally probable, evaluatively extreme, and arousing. These results provide support for the hypothesis that the negativity bias in affective processing occurs as early as the initial categorization into valence classes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9825526     DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.75.4.887

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  207 in total

Review 1.  Children's health and RF EMF exposure. Views from a risk assessment and risk communication perspective.

Authors:  Peter Wiedemann; Holger Schütz
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2011-05

2.  Automatic attention to emotional stimuli: neural correlates.

Authors:  Luis Carretié; José A Hinojosa; Manuel Martín-Loeches; Francisco Mercado; Manuel Tapia
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Descriptive and evaluative judgment processes: behavioral and electrophysiological indices of processing symmetry and aesthetics.

Authors:  Thomas Jacobsen; Lea Höfel
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Dispositional mindfulness and the attenuation of neural responses to emotional stimuli.

Authors:  Kirk Warren Brown; Robert J Goodman; Michael Inzlicht
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Neural mechanisms underlying the higher levels of subjective well-being in extraverts: pleasant bias and unpleasant resistance.

Authors:  Jiajin Yuan; Jinfu Zhang; Xiaolin Zhou; Jiemin Yang; Xianxin Meng; Qinglin Zhang; Hong Li
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Emotional primes modulate the responses to others' pain: an ERP study.

Authors:  Jing Meng; Li Hu; Lin Shen; Zhou Yang; Hong Chen; Xiting Huang; Todd Jackson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  The current status of research on the structure of evaluative space.

Authors:  Catherine J Norris; Jackie Gollan; Gary G Berntson; John T Cacioppo
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 3.251

8.  ERP dynamics underlying successful directed forgetting of neutral but not negative pictures.

Authors:  Anne Hauswald; Hannah Schulz; Todor Iordanov; Johanna Kissler
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  The impact of extraversion on attentional bias to pleasant stimuli: neuroticism matters.

Authors:  Yixue Lou; Xianxin Meng; Jiemin Yang; Shu Zhang; Quanshan Long; Jiajin Yuan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 10.  Using Event-Related Potentials and Startle to Evaluate Time Course in Anxiety and Depression.

Authors:  Heide Klumpp; Stewart A Shankman
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2017-09-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.