Literature DB >> 29397073

Using Event-Related Potentials and Startle to Evaluate Time Course in Anxiety and Depression.

Heide Klumpp1, Stewart A Shankman2.   

Abstract

The National Institute of Mental Health's Research Domain Criteria initiative is a research framework designed toward understanding psychopathology as abnormalities of dimensional neurobehavioral constructs rather than in terms of DSM-defined categories. Research Domain Criteria constructs within the negative valence domain are particularly relevant for understanding anxiety and depressive disorders, which are pervasive, debilitating, and characterized by negative processing bias. One important direction for Research Domain Criteria research is investigating processes and parameters related to the time course (or chronometry) of negative valenced constructs. Two reliable methods for assessing chronometry are event-related potentials (ERPs) and startle blink. In this qualitative review, we examine ERP and startle studies of individuals with anxiety or depression or individuals vulnerable to affective disorders. The aim of the review is to highlight how these methods can inform the role of chronometry in the spectrum of anxiety and depression. ERP studies examining different chronometry facets of negative valenced responses have shown that transdiagnostic groups of individuals with internalizing psychopathologies exhibit abnormalities at early stages of processing. Startle reactivity studies have robustly differentiated fear-based disorders (e.g., panic disorder, social phobia) from other anxiety disorders (e.g., generalized anxiety disorder) and have also shown that different internalizing phenotypes exhibit different patterns of habituation. Findings lend support to the value of ERP and startle measures in identifying groups that cut across conventional classification systems. We also highlight methodological issues that can aid in the validity and reproducibility of ERP and startle findings and, ultimately, in the goal of developing more precise models of anxiety and depression.
Copyright © 2017 Society of Biological Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Affective disorders; Chronometry; ERP; Research Domain Criteria; Startle blink; Threat

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29397073      PMCID: PMC5801761          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2017.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging        ISSN: 2451-9022


  135 in total

Review 1.  Fears, phobias, and preparedness: toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning.

Authors:  A Ohman; S Mineka
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Test-retest reliability of the emotional stroop task: examining the paradox of measurement change.

Authors:  P Eide; A Kemp; R B Silberstein; P J Nathan; C Stough
Journal:  J Psychol       Date:  2002-09

3.  Temporal course of emotional negativity bias: an ERP study.

Authors:  Yu-Xia Huang; Yue-Jia Luo
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Multilevel models for repeated measures research designs in psychophysiology: an introduction to growth curve modeling.

Authors:  Sean D Kristjansson; John C Kircher; Andrea K Webb
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Time course and task dependence of emotion effects in word processing.

Authors:  Annekathrin Schacht; Werner Sommer
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Beyond fear: rapid spatial orienting toward positive emotional stimuli.

Authors:  Tobias Brosch; David Sander; Gilles Pourtois; Klaus R Scherer
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-04

7.  Assessing fear and anxiety in humans using the threat of predictable and unpredictable aversive events (the NPU-threat test).

Authors:  Anja Schmitz; Christian Grillon
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 13.491

8.  A psychophysiological investigation of threat and reward sensitivity in individuals with panic disorder and/or major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Stewart A Shankman; Brady D Nelson; Casey Sarapas; E Jenna Robison-Andrew; Miranda L Campbell; Sarah E Altman; Sarah Kate McGowan; Andrea C Katz; Stephanie M Gorka
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2012-11-12

9.  Negativity bias for sad faces in depression: An event-related potential study.

Authors:  Qin Dai; Juanjuan Wei; Xiaorui Shu; Zhengzhi Feng
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Motivated attention and family risk for depression: Neuronal generator patterns at scalp elicited by lateralized aversive pictures reveal blunted emotional responsivity.

Authors:  Jürgen Kayser; Craig E Tenke; Karen S Abraham; Daniel M Alschuler; Jorge E Alvarenga; Jamie Skipper; Virginia Warner; Gerard E Bruder; Myrna M Weissman
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 4.881

View more
  3 in total

1.  The time course of responding to aversiveness in females with a history of non-suicidal self-injury.

Authors:  Carter J Funkhouser; Kelly A Correa; Vivian L Carrillo; David M Klemballa; Stewart A Shankman
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 2.997

2.  Cannabis users demonstrate enhanced neural reactivity to reward: An event-related potential and time-frequency EEG study.

Authors:  Natania A Crane; Carter J Funkhouser; Katie L Burkhouse; Heide Klumpp; K Luan Phan; Stewart A Shankman
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 3.913

3.  Using what we know about threat reactivity models to understand mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Carter J Funkhouser; David M Klemballa; Stewart A Shankman
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2022-03-25
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.