Literature DB >> 9825329

Optimization of ventricular function by improving the activation sequence during ventricular pacing.

F W Prinzen1, M F Van Oosterhout, W Y Vanagt, C Storm, R S Reneman.   

Abstract

Abnormal electrical activation occurring during ventricular pacing reduces left ventricular (LV) pump function. Two strategies were compared to optimize LV function using ventricular pacing, minimal asynchrony and optimal sequence of electrical activation. ECG and hemodynamics aortic flowprobe, thermodilution cardiac output, LV pressure and its maximal rates of rise (LVdP/dtpos) and fall (LVdP/dtneg) were measured in anesthetized open-chest dogs (n = 7) with healthy hearts. The QRS duration (a measure of asynchrony of activation) was 47 +/- 5 ms during sinus rhythm and increased to 110 +/- 12 ms during DDD pacing at the right ventricular (RV) apex with a short AV interval. During pacing at the LV apex and LV base, the QRS duration was 8% +/- 7% and 15% +/- 7% (P < 0.05) longer than during RV apex pacing, respectively. Stroke volumes, LVdP/dtpos and LVdP/dtneg, however, were higher during LV apex (15% +/- 16%, 10% +/- 12% [P < 0.05], and 15% +/- 10%, respectively) and LV base pacing (11% +/- 12% [P < 0.05], 3% +/- 12%, and 3% +/- 11%, respectively) than during RV apex pacing. Systolic LV pressure was not influenced significantly by the site of pacing. Biventricular pacing (RV apex together with one or two LV sites) decreased the QRS duration by approximately 20% as compared with RV apex pacing, however, it did not improve stroke volumes, LVdP/dtpos and LVdP/dtneg beyond those during pacing at the LV apex alone. In conclusion, the sequence of electrical activation is a stronger determinant of ventricular function than the synchrony of activation. For optimal LV function the selection of an optimal single pacing site, like the LV apex, is more important than pacing from multiple sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9825329     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb01163.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  13 in total

1.  Interventricular septal or standard apical pacing in pacing dependent patients: still a dilemma?

Authors:  Roxana Cristina Rimbas Sisu; Mircea Cinteza; Dragos Vinereanu
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2010-07

2.  Chronic left ventricular pacing preserves left ventricular function in children.

Authors:  Irene E van Geldorp; Ward Y Vanagt; Urs Bauersfeld; Maren Tomaske; Frits W Prinzen; Tammo Delhaas
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Differential Effects of Ventricular Pacing Sites of Contraction Synchrony and Global Cardiac Performance.

Authors:  Mohammed Alhammouri; Hyung Kook Kim; Yasser Mokhtar; Maxime Cannesson; Masaki Tanabe; John Gorcsan; David Schwartzman; Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  Crit Care Shock       Date:  2009-05-01

4.  Differential Effects of Left Ventricular Pacing Sites on Regional Contraction Patterns and Global Performance.

Authors:  Michael R Pinsky; Hyung Kook Kim; Sven Zenker; Lauren Johnson; Sanjeev Shroff
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  Global electrophysiological and hemodynamic assessment of ventricular pacing employing non-contact mapping.

Authors:  Nicholas D Skadsberg; Daniel R Kaiser; Trent M Fischer; Paul A Iaizzo
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Intramural dyssynchrony from acute right ventricular apical pacing in human subjects with normal left ventricular function.

Authors:  Alan J Bank; David S Schwartzman; Kevin V Burns; Christopher L Kaufman; Stuart W Adler; Aaron S Kelly; Lauren Johnson; Daniel R Kaiser
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  First-degree atrioventricular block. Clinical manifestations, indications for pacing, pacemaker management & consequences during cardiac resynchronization.

Authors:  S Serge Barold; Arzu Ilercil; Fabio Leonelli; Bengt Herweg
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 1.900

8.  Canine left ventricle electromechanical behavior under different pacing modes.

Authors:  Thanh-Thuy Vo Thang; Bernard Thibault; Vincent Finnerty; Matthieu Pelletier-Galarneau; Paul Khairy; Jean Grégoire; François Harel
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 9.  Chronic ventricular pacing in children: toward prevention of pacing-induced heart disease.

Authors:  Irene E van Geldorp; Ward Y Vanagt; Frits W Prinzen; Tammo Delhaas
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.214

10.  Use of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography to assess left ventricular systolic synchronization after dual-chamber pacing therapy.

Authors:  Lin Liu; Lianzhong Zhang; Shaobo Duan
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.