Literature DB >> 9824608

Colorectal neoplasm detection using virtual colonoscopy: a feasibility study.

H M Fenlon1, D P Nunes, P D Clarke, J T Ferrucci.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Virtual colonoscopy is a potentially powerful tool for non-invasive colorectal evaluation. In vitro studies have established its accuracy in simulated polyp detection but little data exist regarding its use in clinical practice. AIMS: To evaluate the ability of virtual colonoscopy to detect colorectal cancers and polyps in patients with endoscopically proven colorectal neoplasms and to correlate the findings of virtual colonoscopy with those of conventional colonoscopy, surgery, and histopathology. PATIENTS: Thirty eight patients with endoscopic findings suggestive of colorectal carcinoma.
METHODS: Virtual colonoscopy was performed using thin section helical computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis after rectal insufflation of room air. Commercially available software was used to generate endoscopic "fly through" examinations of the colon from the CT data. Results were correlated with the findings of conventional colonoscopy and with the surgical and histopathological outcome in each case.
RESULTS: Thirty eight pathologically proven colorectal cancers and 23 adenomatous polyps were present. On virtual colonoscopy, all cancers and all polyps measuring greater than 6 mm in size were identified; there were two false positive reports of polyps. On conventional colonoscopy, there was one false positive report of a malignant sigmoid stricture; four subcentimetre polyps were overlooked. Virtual colonoscopy enabled visualisation of the entire colon in 35 patients; conventional colonoscopy was incomplete in 14 patients. Virtual colonoscopy correctly localised all 38 cancers, compared with 32 using conventional colonoscopy.
CONCLUSION: Virtual colonoscopy is a feasible method for evaluating the colon; it may have role in diagnosis of colorectal cancer and polyps.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9824608      PMCID: PMC1727352          DOI: 10.1136/gut.43.6.806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  19 in total

1.  Management of colonoscopic perforations.

Authors:  D R Farley; M P Bannon; S P Zietlow; J H Pemberton; D M Ilstrup; D R Larson
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Colorectal polyp detection with CT colography: two- versus three-dimensional techniques. Work in progress.

Authors:  A K Hara; C D Johnson; J E Reed; R L Ehman; D M Ilstrup
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Perspective volume rendering of CT and MR images: applications for endoscopic imaging.

Authors:  G D Rubin; C F Beaulieu; V Argiro; H Ringl; A M Norbash; J F Feller; M D Dake; R B Jeffrey; S Napel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Virtual endoscopy: is it reality?

Authors:  D J Vining
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Screening in cyberspace: the next generation?

Authors:  D A Ahlquist; C D Johnson
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Virtual cystoscopy: early clinical experience.

Authors:  H M Fenlon; T V Bell; H K Ahari; S Hussain
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Reducing data size and radiation dose for CT colonography.

Authors:  A K Hara; C D Johnson; J E Reed; D A Ahlquist; H Nelson; R L Ehman; W S Harmsen
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  CT colonoscopy of colorectal neoplasms: two-dimensional and three-dimensional virtual-reality techniques with colonoscopic correlation.

Authors:  A P Royster; H M Fenlon; P D Clarke; D P Nunes; J T Ferrucci
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Technical report: spiral CT pneumocolon for suspected colonic neoplasms.

Authors:  Z Amin; P B Boulos; W R Lees
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.350

10.  Detection of colorectal polyps by computed tomographic colography: feasibility of a novel technique.

Authors:  A K Hara; C D Johnson; J E Reed; D A Ahlquist; H Nelson; R L Ehman; C H McCollough; D M Ilstrup
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Virtual colonoscopy.

Authors:  S Halligan; H M Fenlon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-11-06

Review 2.  [Conventional and virtual colonoscopy].

Authors:  C Ell; T Rabenstein
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 0.743

3.  Combined PET/CT colonography: is this the way forward?

Authors:  A G Schreyer; R Kikinis
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement of CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy).

Authors:  P Pescatore; T Glücker; J Delarive; R Meuli; D Pantoflickova; B Duvoisin; P Schnyder; A L Blum; G Dorta
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  [Indications for and results of CT colonography: from screening to the symptomatic patient].

Authors:  A Graser; T Mang; C R Becker; M F Reiser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  The ADENOMA Study. Accuracy of Detection using Endocuff Vision™ Optimization of Mucosal Abnormalities: study protocol for randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Roisin Bevan; Wee Sing Ngu; Brian P Saunders; Zacharias Tsiamoulos; Paul Bassett; Zoe Hoare; Colin J Rees
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2015-11-27

Review 7.  Can technology increase adenoma detection rate?

Authors:  Wee Sing Ngu; Colin Rees
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 4.409

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.