Literature DB >> 12731416

[Conventional and virtual colonoscopy].

C Ell1, T Rabenstein.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2003        PMID： 12731416     DOI： 10.1007/s00108-003-0867-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Internist (Berl)        ISSN： 0020-9554            Impact factor:   0.743


× No keyword cloud information.
  18 in total

1.  Usefulness of CT colonography in patients with incomplete colonoscopy.

Authors:  M Macari; P Berman; M Dicker; A Milano; A J Megibow
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  A comparison of colonoscopy and double-contrast barium enema for surveillance after polypectomy. National Polyp Study Work Group.

Authors:  S J Winawer; E T Stewart; A G Zauber; J H Bond; H Ansel; J D Waye; D Hall; J A Hamlin; M Schapiro; M J O'Brien; S S Sternberg; L S Gottlieb
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Magnetic resonance colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colonic endoluminal lesions.

Authors:  G Pappalardo; E Polettini; F M Frattaroli; E Casciani; C D'Orta; M D'Amato; G F Gualdi
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Colon cancer screening with virtual colonoscopy: promise, polyps, politics.

Authors:  J T Ferrucci
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Colonic masses: detection with MR colonography.

Authors:  W Luboldt; P Bauerfeind; S Wildermuth; B Marincek; M Fried; J F Debatin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement of CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy).

Authors:  P Pescatore; T Glücker; J Delarive; R Meuli; D Pantoflickova; B Duvoisin; P Schnyder; A L Blum; G Dorta
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Colorectal neoplasm detection using virtual colonoscopy: a feasibility study.

Authors:  H M Fenlon; D P Nunes; P D Clarke; J T Ferrucci
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection.

Authors:  Michael Macari; Edmund J Bini; Xiaonan Xue; Andrew Milano; Seth S Katz; Daniel Resnick; Hersh Chandarana; Glen Krinsky; Klaus Klingenbeck; Christopher H Marshall; Alec J Megibow
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Performance of multidetector computed tomography colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy.

Authors:  Th Gluecker; G Dorta; W Keller; P Jornod; R Meuli; P Schnyder
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Patient acceptance and effectiveness of a balanced lavage solution (Golytely) versus the standard preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  G Thomas; S Brozinsky; J I Isenberg
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 22.682
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.