Literature DB >> 9824016

Comparison of pleural fluid pH values obtained using blood gas machine, pH meter, and pH indicator strip.

D S Cheng1, R M Rodriguez, J Rogers, M Wagster, D L Starnes, R W Light.   

Abstract

STUDY
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the pleural fluid pH values obtained with a blood gas machine (pHbg), with a pH meter (pHmet), and with a pH indicator strip (pHstrip), to determine if the pleural fluid pH measured by a pH meter or a pH indicator strip was sufficiently accurate for clinical decisions.
METHODS: The pleural fluid pH was determined, within 20 min after being collected anaerobically, by a blood gas machine (CIBA-Corning model 288), pH meter (Corning pH meter 610A), and pH indicator strip (Baxter Diagnostic) following routine laboratory procedures in 50 pleural fluids. Pleural fluid pH was determined in seven additional samples with the blood gas machine and a pH meter at 25 and 37 degrees C respectively, initially, and after 30 min.
RESULTS: The mean pHbg (7.42+/-0.01) was significantly less than the mean pHmet (7.58+/-0.02) or the mean pHstrip (8.23+/-0.06). There were significant differences between the pHbg and the pHmet (p < 0.001), and between the pHbg and the pHstrip (p < 0.001). Analysis of the additional seven samples demonstrated that when the blood gas machine was set at 25 degrees C, the pHbg (pHbg = 7.54+/-0.02) and the pHmet (7.53+/-0.01) were almost identical.
CONCLUSION: When the pleural fluid pH is going to be used for decision making, only the pH values provided by the blood gas machine are sufficiently accurate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9824016     DOI: 10.1378/chest.114.5.1368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  13 in total

1.  BTS guidelines for the management of pleural infection.

Authors:  C W H Davies; F V Gleeson; R J O Davies
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 2.  Staphylococcal adaptation to diverse physiologic niches: an overview of transcriptomic and phenotypic changes in different biological environments.

Authors:  Sana S Dastgheyb; Michael Otto
Journal:  Future Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 3.165

3.  Effect of mild acid on gene expression in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Brian Weinrick; Paul M Dunman; Fionnuala McAleese; Ellen Murphy; Steven J Projan; Yuan Fang; Richard P Novick
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Clinically important factors influencing the diagnostic measurement of pleural fluid pH and glucose.

Authors:  Najib M Rahman; Eleanor K Mishra; Helen E Davies; Robert J O Davies; Y C Gary Lee
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 5.  Biochemical Analysis of Pleural Fluid and Ascites.

Authors:  Sa Paul Chubb; Robin A Williams
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2018-05

Review 6.  A review of the management of complex para-pneumonic effusion in adults.

Authors:  Vikas Koppurapu; Nikhil Meena
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Pleural infection-current diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Andrew Rosenstengel
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Relationship of pleural fluid pH and glucose: a multi-centre study of 2,971 cases.

Authors:  Deirdre B Fitzgerald; Su Lyn Leong; Charley A Budgeon; Kevin Murray; Andrew Rosenstengal; Nicola A Smith; Silvia Bielsa; Amelia O Clive; Nick A Maskell; José M Porcel; Y C Gary Lee
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Pleural fluid glucose testing using a finger stick glucometer: a novel bedside test.

Authors:  Tony F Abdo; Himanshu Bhardwaj; Muhammad K Ishaq; Jean I Keddissi; Houssein A Youness
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 10.  Evaluation and management of pleural sepsis.

Authors:  Justin K Lui; Ehab Billatos; Frank Schembri
Journal:  Respir Med       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 4.582

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.