Literature DB >> 9823478

Dynamic cortical networks of verbal and spatial working memory: effects of memory load and task practice.

L K McEvoy1, M E Smith, A Gevins.   

Abstract

Working memory (WM), the ability to briefly retain and manipulate information in mind, is central to intelligent behavior. Here we take advantage of the high temporal resolution of electrophysiological measures to obtain a millisecond timescale view of the activity induced in distributed cortical networks by tasks that impose significant WM demands. We examined how these networks are affected by the type and amount of information to be remembered, and by the amount of task practice. Evoked potentials (EPs) were obtained from eight subjects performing spatial and verbal versions of a visual n-back WM task (n = 1, 2, 3) on each of three testing days. In well-trained subjects, WM tasks elicited transient responses reflecting different subcomponents of task processing, including transient (lasting 0.02-0.3 s) task-sensitive and load-sensitive EPs, as well as sustained responses (lasting 1-1.5 s), including the prestimulus Contingent Negative Variation (CNV), and post-stimulus frontal and parietal Slow Waves. The transient responses, with the exception of the P300, differed between the verbal and spatial task versions, and between trials with different response requirements. The P300 and the Slow Waves were not affected by task version but were affected by increased WM load. These results suggest that WM emerges from the formation of a dynamic cortical network linking task-specific processes with non-specific, capacity-limited, higher-order attentional processes. Practice effects on the EPs suggested that practice led to the development of a more effective cognitive strategy for dealing with lower-order aspects of task processing, but did not diminish demands made on higher order processes. Thus a simple WM task is shown to be composed of numerous elementary subsecond neural processes whose characteristics vary with type and amount of information being remembered, and amount of practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9823478     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/8.7.563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  51 in total

1.  Electroencephalographic imaging of higher brain function.

Authors:  A Gevins; M E Smith; L K McEvoy; H Leong; J Le
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1999-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Mechanisms underlying age- and performance-related differences in working memory.

Authors:  Kirk R Daffner; Hyemi Chong; Xue Sun; Elise C Tarbi; Jenna L Riis; Scott M McGinnis; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  The spotlight of attention illuminates failed feature-based expectancies.

Authors:  Jesse J Bengson; Javier Lopez-Calderon; George R Mangun
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Practice-related improvement in working memory is modulated by changes in processing external interference.

Authors:  Anne S Berry; Theodore P Zanto; Aaron M Rutman; Wesley C Clapp; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The impact of moderate sleep loss on neurophysiologic signals during working-memory task performance.

Authors:  Michael E Smith; Linda K McEvoy; Alan Gevins
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 5.849

6.  Long-term and within-day variability of working memory performance and EEG in individuals.

Authors:  Alan Gevins; Linda K McEvoy; Michael E Smith; Cynthia S Chan; Lita Sam-Vargas; Cliff Baum; Aaron B Ilan
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-12-11       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  ERP characterization of sustained attention effects in visual lexical categorization.

Authors:  Clara D Martin; Guillaume Thierry; Jean-François Démonet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Stage and load effects on ERP topography during verbal and spatial working memory.

Authors:  Janet L Shucard; Ayda Tekok-Kilic; Keri Shiels; David W Shucard
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Working memory load for faces modulates P300, N170, and N250r.

Authors:  Helen M Morgan; Christoph Klein; Stephan G Boehm; Kimron L Shapiro; David E J Linden
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Efficiency of working memory encoding in twins discordant for schizophrenia.

Authors:  Peter Bachman; Junghoon Kim; Cindy M Yee; Sebastian Therman; Marko Manninen; Jouko Lönnqvist; Jaakko Kaprio; Matti O Huttunen; Risto Näätänen; Tyrone D Cannon
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 3.222

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.