Literature DB >> 9822941

Physical activity related energy expenditure in children by doubly labeled water as compared with the Caltrac accelerometer.

R K Johnson1, J Russ, M I Goran.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether the Caltrac accelerometer was a meaningful predictor of physical activity related energy expenditure (AEE) in free-living, pre-adolescent children.
SUBJECTS: The sample consisted of 31 children (14 girls, 17 boys; 22 Caucasian, 9 Mohawk) with a mean age of 8.3 (+/- 2.0) y. MEASUREMENTS: AEE was measured by subtracting postprandial resting metabolic rate (RMR), measured via indirect calorimetry, from total daily energy expenditure (TDEE), derived from the doubly labeled water (DLW) method. Average daily activity counts (AC) were measured using a Caltrac accelerometer, which was worn for three days, two weekdays and one weekend day, within the DLW dosing period.
RESULTS: AEE was related to gender (r = 0.42, P = 0.02), fat mass (FM, r = 0.32; P = 0.07), and fat free mass (FFM, r = 0.32; P = 0.07), but not to AC (r = -0.09; P = 0.63). After adjusting for gender, race, FM and FFM using multiple correlation regression analysis (R = 0.53), AC did not significantly increase the amount of variation explained in AEE. An estimate of the calories expended in physical activity was derived from AC using a formula developed by Sallis et al. This estimate was significantly higher than AEE (956 kcal/d vs 469 kcal/d, respectively, t = 5.9, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The Caltrac was not a meaningful predictor of AEE in our sample. The caloric estimates of energy expended in physical activity derived from the Caltrac AC, were significantly higher in comparison with measured AEE in these free-living children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9822941     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0800723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord


  11 in total

Review 1.  Challenges and opportunities for measuring physical activity in sedentary adults.

Authors:  C E Tudor-Locke; A M Myers
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Physical activity assessment in children and adolescents.

Authors:  J R Sirard; R R Pate
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Validity of uniaxial accelerometry during activities of daily living in children.

Authors:  Joey C Eisenmann; Scott J Strath; Danny Shadrick; Paul Rigsby; Nicole Hirsch; Leigh Jacobson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-10-21       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Physical activity level measured by doubly labeled water and accelerometry in children.

Authors:  Marije B Hoos; G Plasqui; Willem-Jan M Gerver; Klaas R Westerterp
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-07-09       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Validation of cross-sectional time series and multivariate adaptive regression splines models for the prediction of energy expenditure in children and adolescents using doubly labeled water.

Authors:  Nancy F Butte; William W Wong; Anne L Adolph; Maurice R Puyau; Firoz A Vohra; Issa F Zakeri
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 4.798

6.  Review of prediction models to estimate activity-related energy expenditure in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Suzanne M de Graauw; Janke F de Groot; Marco van Brussel; Marjolein F Streur; Tim Takken
Journal:  Int J Pediatr       Date:  2010-06-29

7.  Protocol for the modeling the epidemiologic transition study: a longitudinal observational study of energy balance and change in body weight, diabetes and cardiovascular disease risk.

Authors:  Amy Luke; Pascal Bovet; Terrence E Forrester; Estelle V Lambert; Jacob Plange-Rhule; Dale A Schoeller; Lara R Dugas; Ramon A Durazo-Arvizu; David Shoham; Richard S Cooper; Soren Brage; Ulf Ekelund; Nelia P Steyn
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  French Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire compared with an accelerometer cut point to classify physical activity among pregnant obese women.

Authors:  Nadia Chandonnet; Didier Saey; Natalie Alméras; Isabelle Marc
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A follow-up study to assess the determinants and consequences of physical activity in pregnant women of Cuenca, Spain.

Authors:  Raquel Poyatos-León; Gema Sanabria-Martínez; Jorge Cañete García-Prieto; Celia Álvarez-Bueno; Diana P Pozuelo-Carrascosa; Iván Cavero-Redondo; Antonio García-Hermoso; Sagrario Gómez-Cantarino; Miriam Garrido-Miguel; Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Energy expenditure compared to physical activity measured by accelerometry and self-report in adolescents: a validation study.

Authors:  Pedro C Hallal; Felipe F Reichert; Valerie L Clark; Kelly L Cordeira; Ana M B Menezes; Simon Eaton; Ulf Ekelund; Jonathan C Wells
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.