Literature DB >> 9820441

Prescribed versus delivered dialysis in acute renal failure patients.

J A Evanson1, J Himmelfarb, R Wingard, S Knights, Y Shyr, G Schulman, T A Ikizler, R M Hakim.   

Abstract

The current study was designed first to determine separately the prescribed and delivered dose of dialysis and, second, to determine what factors lead to failure to deliver the prescribed dose of dialysis in patients with acute renal failure (ARF). Forty patients, who collectively underwent 136 dialysis treatments, were studied prospectively at two institutions. The results showed that almost half the prescriptions (49%) were for a Kt/V less than 1.2 and, more importantly, nearly 70% of the treatments delivered a Kt/V less than 1.2, the minimally acceptable dose defined in the Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative (DOQI) guidelines for chronic hemodialysis (CHD) patients. Patient predialysis weight was the most important variable associated with a low prescribed and delivered dose of dialysis, as well as lack of delivery of the prescribed dose of dialysis. From the statistical model, it is estimated that for every 10-kg increase in predialysis weight, the chance of prescribing or delivering a Kt/V less than 1.2 increased 4.6- and 1.95-fold, respectively. The lower than prescribed blood flow achieved by the temporary catheters and patients not receiving anticoagulation were variables also associated with not receiving the prescribed Kt/V. It is concluded that patients with ARF are prescribed and receive a dose of dialysis that would be considered inadequate for CHD patients. Until the association between dose of dialysis and outcome is better defined, it would be prudent that both the dialysis prescription and the delivery of dialysis to patients with ARF should be performed with the same care and goals as that currently received by patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9820441     DOI: 10.1016/s0272-6386(98)70127-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis        ISSN: 0272-6386            Impact factor:   8.860


  14 in total

Review 1.  Effluent volume and dialysis dose in CRRT: time for reappraisal.

Authors:  Etienne Macedo; Rolando Claure-Del Granado; Ravindra L Mehta
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 2.  The dark side of high-intensity renal replacement therapy of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Helmut Schiffl
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Dialysis: Results of RENAL--what is the optimal CRRT target dose?

Authors:  John A Kellum; Claudio Ronco
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 4.  Acute kidney injury.

Authors:  John A Kellum; Mark L Unruh; Raghavan Murugan
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2011-03-28

5.  Effluent volume in continuous renal replacement therapy overestimates the delivered dose of dialysis.

Authors:  Rolando Claure-Del Granado; Etienne Macedo; Glenn M Chertow; Sharon Soroko; Jonathan Himmelfarb; T Alp Ikizler; Emil P Paganini; Ravindra L Mehta
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  Toward the optimal dose metric in continuous renal replacement therapy.

Authors:  Rolando Claure-Del Granado; Etienne Macedo; Glenn M Chertow; Sharon Soroko; Jonathan Himmelfarb; T Alp Ikizler; Emil P Paganini; Ravindra L Mehta
Journal:  Int J Artif Organs       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.595

7.  Ionic dialysance: a new valid parameter for quantification of dialysis efficiency in acute renal failure?

Authors:  Christophe Ridel; David Osman; Lucile Mercadal; Nadia Anguel; Thierry Petitclerc; Christian Richard; Christophe Vinsonneau
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Management of renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury: a survey of practitioner prescribing practices.

Authors:  Pamela Overberger; Matthew Pesacreta; Paul M Palevsky
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 8.237

9.  Early acid-base and blood pressure effects of continuous renal replacement therapy intensity in patients with metabolic acidosis.

Authors:  Rinaldo Bellomo; Miklos Lipcsey; Paolo Calzavacca; Michael Haase; Anjia Haase-Fielitz; Elisa Licari; Augustine Tee; Louise Cole; Alan Cass; Simon Finfer; Martin Gallagher; Joanne Lee; Serigne Lo; Colin McArthur; Shay McGuinness; John Myburgh; Carlos Scheinkestel
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Delivered dose of renal replacement therapy and mortality in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Sergio Vesconi; Dinna N Cruz; Roberto Fumagalli; Detlef Kindgen-Milles; Gianpaola Monti; Anibal Marinho; Filippo Mariano; Marco Formica; Mariano Marchesi; Robert René; Sergio Livigni; Claudio Ronco
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.