Literature DB >> 9819323

Females prefer leading males: relative call timing and sexual selection in katydid choruses.

.   

Abstract

Females of several acoustic insects and anurans have recently been shown to orient preferentially to the leading of two identical male calls presented in close succession. We studied this phenomenon via two-choice phonotaxis trials in the neotropical katydid Neoconocephalus spiza and found that females avoided male calls occurring during an interval beginning immediately after the onset of a leading call. This avoidance occurred whether or not the following call was overlapped by the leader, indicating that the mechanism of preference for leading calls may represent a psychoacoustic precedence effect rather than simple call masking. We also found that females preferred leading calls as long as the amplitude of the following call was not more than 2 dB higher than the leader. Under certain circumstances, preferences for leading calls remained when females were presented with a sequence of four calls. Thus, preferences for leading calls probably influence a male's attractiveness and mating success in complex natural choruses: females are expected to orient towards males producing leading calls regardless of call length (and the probability of overlapping a following call), when the leading call is up to 1.5 times as distant as a follower, and when succeeded by multiple followers. We suggest that female preferences for leading male calls represent sensory biases that originated in contexts unrelated to sexual selection. None the less they currently play an important role in sexual selection and influence individual male signalling behaviour, and thus chorus structure. Copyright 1998 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 9819323     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0871

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  18 in total

1.  A precedence effect resolves phantom sound source illusions in the parasitoid fly Ormia ochracea.

Authors:  Norman Lee; Damian O Elias; Andrew C Mason
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Attention-like processes in insects.

Authors:  Vivek Nityananda
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Signal interactions and interference in insect choruses: singing and listening in the social environment.

Authors:  Michael D Greenfield
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  A Target-Detecting Visual Neuron in the Dragonfly Locks on to Selectively Attended Targets.

Authors:  Benjamin H Lancer; Bernard J E Evans; Joseph M Fabian; David C O'Carroll; Steven D Wiederman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Synchrony during acoustic interactions in the bushcricket Mecopoda 'Chirper' (Tettigoniidae:Orthoptera) is generated by a combination of chirp-by-chirp resetting and change in intrinsic chirp rate.

Authors:  Vivek Nityananda; Rohini Balakrishnan
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-09-16       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Adaptive significance of synchronous chorusing in an acoustically signalling wolf spider.

Authors:  Janne S Kotiaho; Rauno V Alatalo; Johanna Mappes; Silja Parri
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Mechanisms for synchrony and alternation in song interactions of the bushcricket Mecopoda elongata (Tettigoniidae: Orthoptera).

Authors:  Manfred Hartbauer; Silvia Kratzer; Klaus Steiner; Heiner Römer
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Neuronal correlates of a preference for leading signals in the synchronizing bushcricket Mecopoda elongata (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae).

Authors:  M E Siegert; H Römer; R Hashim; M Hartbauer
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Signalling plasticity and energy saving in a tropical bushcricket.

Authors:  M Hartbauer; A Stabentheiner; H Römer
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Competition and cooperation in a synchronous bushcricket chorus.

Authors:  M Hartbauer; L Haitzinger; M Kainz; H Römer
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.