Literature DB >> 9818068

Using anecdotal information in evidence-based health care: heresy or necessity?

M W Enkin1, A R Jadad.   

Abstract

Anecdotes are powerful tools that humans use to make decisions. Despite their power and influence, they are sometimes misused, and sometimes undervalued. Ignoring or under-estimating the role of anecdotal information in health care decisions is likely to hinder communication among decision makers, and to retard their uptake of research evidence. Anecdotal information should not be considered as a replacement for, but as a complement to formal research evidence. If evidence-based health care is to meet its potential, the important role of anecdotes must be acknowledged, studied and utilized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9818068     DOI: 10.1023/A:1008495101125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  13 in total

1.  The new alchemy: transmuting information into knowledge in an electronic age.

Authors:  A R Jadad; M W Enkin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-06-27       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  For and against: clinical equipoise and not the uncertainty principle is the moral underpinning of the randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  C Weijer; S H Shapiro; K Cranley Glass
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-09-23

3.  Should we continue pairing the term 'anecdotal' with evidence?

Authors:  Robert Atenstaedt
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Enhancing prevention in primary care: are interventions targeted towards consumers' and providers' perceived needs?

Authors:  Marie-Dominique Beaulieu; Yves Talbot; Alejandro R. Jadad; Marianne Xhignesse
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  How can psychological science inform research about genetic counseling for clinical genomic sequencing?

Authors:  Cynthia M Khan; Christine Rini; Barbara A Bernhardt; J Scott Roberts; Kurt D Christensen; James P Evans; Kyle B Brothers; Myra I Roche; Jonathan S Berg; Gail E Henderson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Provider Recommendations in the Face of Scientific Uncertainty: An Analysis of Audio-Recorded Discussions about Vitamin D.

Authors:  Derjung M Tarn; Debora A Paterniti; Neil S Wenger
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 7.  Selected pharmacokinetic issues of the use of antiepileptic drugs and parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Muhannad R M Salih; Mohd Baidi Bahari; Arwa Y Abd
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 3.271

8.  Evidence-informed decision-making by professionals working in addiction agencies serving women: a descriptive qualitative study.

Authors:  Susan M Jack; Maureen Dobbins; Wendy Sword; Gabriela Novotna; Sandy Brooks; Ellen L Lipman; Alison Niccols
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2011-11-07

9.  SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 15: Engaging the public in evidence-informed policymaking.

Authors:  Andrew D Oxman; Simon Lewin; John N Lavis; Atle Fretheim
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2009-12-16

10.  Lay perceptions of evidence-based information--a qualitative evaluation of a website for back pain sufferers.

Authors:  Claire Glenton; Elin S Nilsen; Benedicte Carlsen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.