Literature DB >> 9817394

Histological and clinical findings in 896 consecutive prostates treated only with radical retropubic prostatectomy: epidemiologic significance of annual changes.

T A Stamey1, A N Donaldson, C E Yemoto, J E McNeal, S Sözen, H Gill.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recognizing that the unprecedented increase in new cases of prostate cancer between 1988 and 1996 actually peaked in 1992 and has now returned to baseline, we examined our clinical and histological database for annual trends in 896 consecutive men treated only with radical prostatectomy for clinical stages T1c to T2c from 1988 to 1996.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All radical prostatectomy specimens were examined prospectively in 3 mm. step sections by 1 pathologist. Using multiple logistic regression for dichotomous variables and multiple linear regression for continuous variables, both corrected for age, we assessed the annual trends for significant changes in T1c versus T2 clinical stages, preoperative serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), cancer volume, percent Gleason grade 4/5 in the cancer, location of the cancer in the transition or peripheral zone, organ confined status, seminal vesicle invasion, positive surgical margins, prostate weight and presence of clinically insignificant cancers (less than 0.5 cc in volume).
RESULTS: There were no significant annual changes in the proportion of percent Gleason grade 4/5 cancer, serum PSA, prostate weight or clinically insignificant cancers less than 0.5 cc, and the annual changes for cancer volume were only of moderate significance. T1c cancers increased from 10% in 1988 to 73% in 1996 (p=0.0001), organ confined cancers from 40 to 75% (p=0.0001) and transition zone cancers from 10 to 21% (p=0.003). Seminal vesicle invasion decreased from 18 to 5% (p=0.001) and positive surgical margins from 30 to 14 (p=0.006). Mean patient age changed from 65 to 62 years (p=0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: We believe that the extraordinary rise and fall in prostate cancer detection rates from 1990 to 1994 primarily removed previously undetected T2 cancers from the pool at large, leaving impalpable T1c cancers as the primary reservoir of prostate cancers in the United States. Importantly, cancer volume, percent Gleason grade 4/5 cancer, serum PSA and cancers less than 0.5 cc have not had a highly significant change during these critical 9 years. These data argue strongly that current PSA testing has not resulted in the detection of clinically insignificant cancers, and that PSA screening should be expanded and not restricted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9817394     DOI: 10.1097/00005392-199812020-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  20 in total

1.  Expectant management of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Masood A Khan; Alan W Partin
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2003

2.  [Incidental carcinoma of the prostate: can we and should we recommend radical prostatectomy?].

Authors:  R Paul; C Knebel; H van Randenborgh; H Kübler; M Alschibaja; M Günther; R Hartung
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Molecular cytogenetic analysis of prostatic adenocarcinomas from screening studies : early cancers may contain aggressive genetic features.

Authors:  J C Alers; P J Krijtenburg; A N Vis; R F Hoedemaeker; M F Wildhagen; W C Hop; T T van Der Kwast; F H Schröder; H J Tanke; H van Dekken
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.307

4.  Younger patients have poorer biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sung Kyu Hong; Jung Soo Nam; Woong Na; Jong Jin Oh; Cheol Yong Yoon; Chang Wook Jeong; Hyun June Kim; Seok-Soo Byun; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 3.285

5.  Symmetry based prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  L Yang; Y Xie; B Li; M Xie; X Wang; J Zhang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Multi-parametric MR imaging of transition zone prostate cancer: Imaging features, detection and staging.

Authors:  Arda Kayhan; Xiaobing Fan; Jacob Oommen; Aytekin Oto
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-05-28

7.  Shift of tumor features in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy since the beginning of the PSA era.

Authors:  Herbert Augustin; Marco Auprich; Philipp Stummvoll; Katja Lipsky; Karl Pummer; Peter Petritsch
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.704

8.  Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values of the Benign Central Zone of the Prostate: Comparison With Low- and High-Grade Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Rajan T Gupta; Christopher R Kauffman; Kirema Garcia-Reyes; Mark L Palmeri; John F Madden; Thomas J Polascik; Andrew B Rosenkrantz
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  An analysis of a multiple biomarker panel to better predict prostate cancer metastasis after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Alison Y Zhang; Karen Chiam; Ygal Haupt; Stephen Fox; Simone Birch; Wayne Tilley; Lisa M Butler; Karen Knudsen; Clay Comstock; Krishan Rasiah; Judith Grogan; Kate L Mahon; Tina Bianco-Miotto; Carmela Ricciardelli; Maret Böhm; Susan Henshall; Warick Delprado; Phillip Stricker; Lisa G Horvath; James G Kench
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of anterior prostate cancer: morphometric assessment and correlation with radical prostatectomy findings.

Authors:  Laurent Lemaitre; Philippe Puech; Edouard Poncelet; Sébastien Bouyé; Xavier Leroy; Jacques Biserte; Arnauld Villers
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.