Literature DB >> 9813553

Effect of time from onset to coming under care on fatality of patients with acute myocardial infarction: effect of resuscitation and thrombolytic treatment. The United Kingdom Heart Attack Study (UKHAS) Collaborative Group.

.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relation between time from onset of symptoms and coming under ambulance and hospital care on fatality in patients with evolving acute myocardial infarction, and on the proportions who survive because of resuscitation and thrombolytic treatment.
DESIGN: Prospective community and hospital study over two years. Delay was measured from the onset of symptoms to arrival at hospital, and from the onset to coming under care from ambulance personnel.
SETTING: Four general hospitals serving three United Kingdom health districts. PATIENTS: 2213 patients under 75 years of age, 111 of whom had been successfully resuscitated from out of hospital cardiac arrest.
INTERVENTIONS: Resuscitation from cardiac arrest; thrombolytic treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 30 day fatality and lives saved by the two forms of treatment.
RESULTS: Times from symptom onset to coming under hospital care and to starting thrombolytic treatment (given to 53% of patients) were < or = 1 hour in 15% and 2% of patients respectively, < or = 2 hours in 54% and 25%, and < or = 4 hours in 67% and 55%. Overall, 30 day fatality was 138/1000 patients treated; 64/1000 (95% confidence interval 54 to 74) survived because of treatment, and 80% of this salvage was attributable to resuscitation. Delay was an important factor: 107/1000 (60 to 144) lives were saved for those coming under care within 1 hour compared with 21/1000 (5 to 37) for those who delayed for more than 12 hours. Further analysis including the 111 patients with out of hospital arrest showed that 34% of those coming to hospital by ambulance came under ambulance care within 1 hour; for this subset, 30 day fatality was 173/1000, and 136 (109 to 163) lives were saved by treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Results of treatment are strongly related to delay in coming under care. Reduction in delay can reduce mortality from acute myocardial infarction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9813553      PMCID: PMC1728777     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  11 in total

1.  Effect of thrombolytic treatment delay on myocardial infarct size.

Authors:  W T Hermens; G M Willems; K M Nijssen; M L Simoons
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-11-21       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Temporal trends and factors associated with extent of delay to hospital arrival in patients with acute myocardial infarction: the Worcester Heart Attack Study.

Authors:  J Yarzebski; R J Goldberg; J M Gore; J S Alpert
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  Early thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction: reappraisal of the golden hour.

Authors:  E Boersma; A C Maas; J W Deckers; M L Simoons
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-09-21       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  The prehospital phase of acute myocardial infarction in the era of thrombolysis.

Authors:  S B Schmidt; M A Borsch
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1990-06-15       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Delay between the onset of symptoms of acute myocardial infarction and seeking medical assistance is influenced by left ventricular function at presentation.

Authors:  R J Trent; E L Rose; J N Adams; K P Jennings; J M Rawles
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1995-02

6.  Prehospital-initiated vs hospital-initiated thrombolytic therapy. The Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Trial.

Authors:  W D Weaver; M Cerqueira; A P Hallstrom; P E Litwin; J S Martin; P J Kudenchuk; M Eisenberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-09-08       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Delay between onset of chest pain and arrival to the coronary care unit among minority and disadvantaged patients.

Authors:  J K Ghali; R S Cooper; I Kowatly; Y Liao
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 1.798

8.  Magnitude of benefit from earlier thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction: new evidence from Grampian region early anistreplase trial (GREAT)

Authors:  J Rawles
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-01-27

9.  Association of patient delay with symptoms, cardiac enzymes, and outcome in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J M Rawles; M J Metcalfe; C Shirreffs; K Jennings; A C Kenmure
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Patient and general practitioner delays in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J M Rawles; N E Haites
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-03-26
View more
  5 in total

1.  Pre-hospital resuscitation: breathing life into a stale subject.

Authors:  C F M Weston
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Fatality outside hospital from acute coronary events in three British health districts, 1994-5. United Kingdom Heart Attack Study Collaborative Group.

Authors:  R M Norris
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-04-04

3.  Acute coronary syndrome: what do patients know?

Authors:  Kathleen Dracup; Sharon McKinley; Lynn V Doering; Barbara Riegel; Hendrika Meischke; Debra K Moser; Michele Pelter; Beverly Carlson; Leanne Aitken; Andrea Marshall; Rebecca Cross; Steven M Paul
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-05-26

4.  Delay and its related factors in seeking treatment in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Mohsen Taghaddosi; Mansour Dianati; Javad Fath Gharib Bidgoli; Javad Bahonaran
Journal:  ARYA Atheroscler       Date:  2010

5.  Factors related to the use of reperfusion strategies in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Gui-yan Yi; Xing-guang Zhang; Jian Zhang; Xian Wang
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 1.637

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.