Literature DB >> 9813520

Influence of cuff volume on oropharyngeal leak pressure and fibreoptic position with the laryngeal mask airway.

C Keller1, F Pühringer, J R Brimacombe.   

Abstract

We studied the size 4 laryngeal mask airway (LMA) to test the hypothesis that oropharyngeal leak pressure and fibreoptic position improves with increasing cuff volume. After LMA insertion, 50 anaesthetized adult patients had the cuff inflated in 5-ml increments to 40 ml. Oropharyngeal leak pressure was optimal at 15 ml and decreased at higher volumes. The fibreoptic position was optimal at 0-20 ml and deteriorated at higher volumes. Gastric insufflation was detected more frequently when the cuff volume exceeded 20 ml. We conclude that inflation of the size 4 LMA to the maximum recommended volume provides suboptimal conditions and that this value should be reduced from 30 to 20 ml.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9813520     DOI: 10.1093/bja/81.2.186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  15 in total

Review 1.  [Laryngeal masks. Possibilities and limits].

Authors:  H Hillebrand; J Motsch
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  The air-Q(®) intubating laryngeal airway vs the LMA-ProSeal(TM) : a prospective, randomised trial of airway seal pressure.

Authors:  R E Galgon; K M Schroeder; S Han; A Andrei; A M Joffe
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 6.955

3.  Successful airway management with use of a laryngeal mask airway in a patient with CHARGE syndrome.

Authors:  Yusuke Hara; Kiichi Hirota; Kazuhiko Fukuda
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Lower intracuff pressure of laryngeal mask airway in the lateral and prone positions compared with that in the supine position.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Yano; Takashi Imaizumi; Chiho Uneda; Ryosuke Nakayama
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Does cuff pressure monitoring reduce postoperative pharyngolaryngeal adverse events after LMA-ProSeal insertion? A parallel group randomised trial.

Authors:  R Vasanth Karthik; Priya Ranganathan; Atul P Kulkarni; Kailash S Sharma
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  Tracheal tube and laryngeal mask cuff pressure during anaesthesia - mandatory monitoring is in need.

Authors:  Kim Z Rokamp; Niels H Secher; Ann M Møller; Henning B Nielsen
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 2.217

7.  Randomised Comparison of the AMBU AuraOnce Laryngeal Mask and the LMA Unique Laryngeal Mask Airway in Spontaneously Breathing Adults.

Authors:  Daryl Lindsay Williams; James M Zeng; Karl D Alexander; David T Andrews
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2012-02-29

8.  Induction for classic laryngeal mask airway insertion: Does low-dose fentanyl work?

Authors:  Akanksha Dutt; Anjum Khan Joad; Mamta Sharma
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-04

9.  Comparison of clinical performance of the I-gel with LMA proseal.

Authors:  Gaurav Chauhan; Pavan Nayar; Anita Seth; Kapil Gupta; Mamta Panwar; Nidhi Agrawal
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-01

10.  AutoFlow® versus volume-controlled ventilation for laparoscopic gynecological surgery using LMA® ProSeal™: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Nakanishi; Seishi Sakamoto; Manabu Yoshimura; Takashi Toriumi
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 2.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.