Literature DB >> 9811098

Microscopic laminotomies for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

R Y Tsai1, R S Yang, R S Bray.   

Abstract

In this retrospective study, we investigated 50 patients who had undergone primary lumbar microsurgical multiple laminotomy without spinal fusion for degenerative spinal stenosis. There were 31 men and 19 women with a median age of 66 years (35-85 years). Thirteen patients had grade I spondylolisthesis, most at L4-L5 levels (11 of 13). Single-level laminotomy was done in 13 patients, two levels in 30, and three levels in 7. The median follow-up period was 27 months (range, 15-48 months). A standardized self-reported questionnaire was used for clinical outcome study. The demographic data and clinical features of these patients were analyzed for the prognostic factors. The analysis showed excellent results in 18 patients, good in 16, fair in 8, and poor in 8, whereas 30 patients reported that they were very satisfied with the surgery results, 10 were somewhat satisfied, 2 were somewhat dissatisfied, and 8 were very dissatisfied. Therefore, the satisfactory rate of the surgery was higher if judged by patient satisfaction. Among the parameters analyzed, the presence of neurogenic claudication (p = 0.008), coexisting disease (p = 0.04), and the absence of motor deficit (p = 0.03) were associated with lower total scores. In addition, longer duration of symptoms (p = 0.04) was associated with less improvement of back pain score, whereas the absence of motor deficit (p = 0.004) was associated with less improvement of leg pain score. The presence of spondylolisthesis did not affect outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9811098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord        ISSN: 0895-0385


  12 in total

Review 1.  The conservative surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly.

Authors:  Robert Gunzburg; Marek Szpalski
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Midterm outcome after unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: 5-year prospective study.

Authors:  Halit Cavuşoğlu; Ramazan Alper Kaya; Osman Nuri Türkmenoglu; Cengiz Tuncer; Ibrahim Colak; Yunus Aydin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Less invasive and less technically demanding decompressive procedure for lumbar spinal stenosis--appropriate for general orthopaedic surgeons?

Authors:  Masashi Takaso; Toshiyuki Nakazawa; Takayuki Imura; Takamitsu Okada; Kensuke Fukushima; Masaki Ueno; Wataru Saito; Ryousuke Shintani; Hiroyuki Sakagami; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Masashi Yamazaki; Seiji Ohtori; Toshiaki Kotani
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Clinical outcomes of microendoscopic decompression surgery for cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Akihito Minamide; Munehito Yoshida; Hiroshi Yamada; Yukihiro Nakagawa; Kazuhiro Maio; Masaki Kawai; Hiroshi Iwasaki
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  A predictive model for outcome after conservative decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  K F Spratt; T S Keller; M Szpalski; K Vandeputte; R Gunzburg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-12-05       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Clinical results of microsurgical bilateral decompression via unilateral approach for lumbar canal stenosis with multiple-level involvement.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Tanaka; Kazuyoshi Nakanishi; Naosuke Kamei; Risako Yamamoto; Toshio Nakamae; Bunichiro Izumi; Ryo Ohta; Yuki Fujioka; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-09-06

7.  Facet-sparing lumbar decompression with a minimally invasive flexible MicroBlade Shaver® versus traditional decompression: quantitative radiographic assessment.

Authors:  Carl Lauryssen; Sigurd Berven; Ronnie Mimran; Christopher Summa; Michael Sheinberg; Larry E Miller; Jon E Block
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 4.458

8.  A comparison of the degree of lateral recess and foraminal enlargement with facet preservation in the treatment of lumbar stenosis with standard surgical tools versus a novel powered filing instrument: a cadaver study.

Authors:  Murat Cosar; Larry T Khoo; Christopher A Yeung; Anthony T Yeung
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2007-11-01

9.  Minimally invasive posterior cervical decompression using tubular retractor: The technical note and early clinical outcome.

Authors:  Jung-Woo Hur; Jin-Sung Kim; Myeong-Hoon Shin; Kyeong-Sik Ryu
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2014-03-15

10.  Minimum 3-year outcomes in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis after bilateral microdecompression by unilateral or bilateral laminotomy.

Authors:  Sang-Mi Yang; Hyung-Ki Park; Jae-Chil Chang; Ra-Sun Kim; Sukh-Que Park; Sung-Jin Cho
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2013-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.