Literature DB >> 25192849

Clinical results of microsurgical bilateral decompression via unilateral approach for lumbar canal stenosis with multiple-level involvement.

Nobuhiro Tanaka1, Kazuyoshi Nakanishi, Naosuke Kamei, Risako Yamamoto, Toshio Nakamae, Bunichiro Izumi, Ryo Ohta, Yuki Fujioka, Mitsuo Ochi.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Microsurgical decompression of the lumbar spine is a beneficial approach for selected patients of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). The purpose of this prospective study was to describe the clinical results of surgical treatment for microsurgical bilateral decompression via unilateral approach on patients with LSS with multiple-level involvement.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-three consecutive patients who had microsurgical bilateral decompression via unilateral approach of more than two spinal levels were included in this study. Seventy-seven patients who had surgery at a single level over the same time periods were compared as a single-level LSS group.
RESULTS: The preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores averaged 11.7 points, and the postoperative scores averaged 21.2 points with an average recovery rate (RR) of 56% in the multiple-level LSS group. There was no significant difference in the RR between the groups. There were no major complications related to the surgery in the both groups.
CONCLUSION: Microsurgical bilateral decompression via unilateral approach was a useful and safe operative procedure for LSS patients. Sufficient clinical results that were comparable to single-level LSS patients were obtained even in the patients with multiple-level LSS, if the patient were correctly selected and the microsurgical decompression surgery were carefully performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25192849     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-014-1532-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  29 in total

1.  Reliability in grading the severity of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  R Drew; M Bhandari; A V Kulkarni; D Louw; K Reddy; B Dunlop
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  2000-06

2.  Bilateral decompression of multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis through a unilateral approach.

Authors:  Katsuhiko Haba; Masato Ikeda; Mariko Soma; Tetsumori Yamashima
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.961

3.  Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation.

Authors:  S D Boden; D O Davis; T S Dina; N J Patronas; S W Wiesel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Quantitative evaluation and visualization of lumbar foraminal nerve root entrapment by using diffusion tensor imaging: preliminary results.

Authors:  Y Eguchi; S Ohtori; S Orita; H Kamoda; G Arai; T Ishikawa; M Miyagi; G Inoue; M Suzuki; Y Masuda; H Andou; M Takaso; Y Aoki; T Toyone; A Watanabe; K Takahashi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Difference in evaluation of patients with low back pain using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score for Back Pain and the Japanese Version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.

Authors:  Masao Nakamura; Kei Miyamoto; Katsuji Shimizu
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 1.601

6.  Microdecompression for lumbar spinal canal stenosis.

Authors:  B K Weiner; M Walker; R S Brower; J A McCulloch
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  A prospective and consecutive study of surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis. Part II: Five-year follow-up by an independent observer.

Authors:  B Jönsson; M Annertz; C Sjöberg; B Strömqvist
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Microsurgical nerve root canal widening without fusion for lumbosacral intervertebral foraminal stenosis: technical notes and early results.

Authors:  H Baba; K Uchida; Y Maezawa; N Furusawa; Y Okumura; S Imura
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.772

9.  Operative results and postoperative progression of ossification among patients with ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament.

Authors:  K Hirabayashi; J Miyakawa; K Satomi; T Maruyama; K Wakano
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1981 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Reliability of readings of magnetic resonance imaging features of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Jon D Lurie; Anna N Tosteson; Tor D Tosteson; Eugene Carragee; John A Carrino; John Carrino; Jay Kaiser; Roberto T Blanco Sequeiros; Amy Rosen Lecomte; Margaret R Grove; Emily A Blood; Loretta H Pearson; James N Weinstein; Richard Herzog
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  3 in total

1.  Baastrup's Disease Is Associated with Recurrent of Sciatica after Posterior Lumbar Spinal Decompressions Utilizing Floating Spinous Process Procedures.

Authors:  Masao Koda; Chikato Mannoji; Masazumi Murakami; Tomoaki Kinoshita; Jiro Hirayama; Tomohiro Miyashita; Yawara Eguchi; Masashi Yamazaki; Takane Suzuki; Masaaki Aramomi; Mitsutoshi Ota; Satoshi Maki; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Takeo Furuya
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2016-12-08

2.  Bilateral decompression and intervertebral fusion via unilateral fenestration for complex lumbar spinal stenosis with a mobile microendoscopic technique.

Authors:  Baoshan Xu; Haiwei Xu; Xinlong Ma; Yue Liu; Qiang Yang; Hongfeng Jiang; Ning Li; Ning Ji
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  The effect of preoperative degenerative spondylolisthesis on postoperative outcomes of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: A single-center cohort study protocol.

Authors:  Yueliang Chang; Fubiao Zhou; Le Fei; Zili Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 1.817

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.