Literature DB >> 9809858

Ethanol induces impulsive-like responding in a delay-of-reward operant choice procedure: impulsivity predicts autoshaping.

A Tomie1, A S Aguado, L A Pohorecky, D Benjamin.   

Abstract

Autoshaping conditioned responses (CRs) are reflexive and targeted motor responses expressed as a result of experience with reward. To evaluate the hypothesis that autoshaping may be a form of impulsive responding, within-subjects correlations between performance on autoshaping and impulsivity tasks were assessed in 15 Long-Evans hooded rats. Autoshaping procedures [insertion of retractable lever conditioned stimulus (CS) followed by the response-independent delivery of food (US)] were followed by testing for impulsive-like responding in a two-choice lever-press operant delay-of-reward procedure (immediate small food reward versus delayed large food reward). Delay-of-reward functions revealed two distinct subject populations. Subjects in the Sensitive group (n=7) were more impulsive-like, increasing immediate reward choices at longer delays for large reward, while those in the Insensitive group (n=8) responded predominantly on only one lever. During the prior autoshaping phase, the Sensitive group had performed more autoshaping CRs, and correlations revealed that impulsive subjects acquired the autoshaping CR in fewer trials. In the Sensitive group, acute injections of ethanol (0, 0.25, 0.50, 1.00, 1.50 g/kg) given immediately before delay-of-reward sessions yielded an inverted U-shaped dose-response curve with increased impulsivity induced by the 0.25, 0.50, and 1.00 g/kg doses of ethanol, while choice strategy of the Insensitive group was not influenced by ethanol dose. Ethanol induced impulsive-like responding only in rats that were flexible in their response strategy (Sensitive group), and this group also performed more autoshaping CRs. Data support the hypothesis that autoshaping and impulsivity are linked.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9809858     DOI: 10.1007/s002130050728

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  41 in total

1.  Alcohol is a drug; a cautionary note on its use as a drug solvent.

Authors:  Hilary J Little
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Contributions of the orbitofrontal cortex to impulsive choice: interactions with basal levels of impulsivity, dopamine signalling, and reward-related cues.

Authors:  Fiona D Zeeb; Stan B Floresco; Catharine A Winstanley
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Alcohol-induced impulsivity in rats: an effect of cue salience?

Authors:  Mary C Olmstead; Kim G C Hellemans; Tracie A Paine
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-12-24       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  Individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience to reward-related cues: Implications for addiction.

Authors:  Shelly B Flagel; Huda Akil; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 5.250

5.  Acute ethanol effects on neural encoding of reward size and delay in the nucleus accumbens.

Authors:  Andrea L Gutman; Sharif A Taha
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Alpha-synuclein deletion decreases motor impulsivity but does not affect risky decision making in a mouse Gambling Task.

Authors:  Yolanda Peña-Oliver; Sandra Sanchez-Roige; David N Stephens; Tamzin L Ripley
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Impulsive choice and anxiety-like behavior in adult rats exposed to chronic intermittent ethanol during adolescence and adulthood.

Authors:  Jana Mejia-Toiber; Nathalie Boutros; Athina Markou; Svetlana Semenova
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Disadvantageous decision-making on a rodent gambling task is associated with increased motor impulsivity in a population of male rats.

Authors:  Michael M Barrus; Jay G Hosking; Fiona D Zeeb; Melanie Tremblay; Catharine A Winstanley
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 6.186

Review 9.  Individual variation in resisting temptation: implications for addiction.

Authors:  Benjamin T Saunders; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  Environments predicting intermittent shortening access reduce operant performance but not home cage binge size in rats.

Authors:  F H E Wojnicki; R K Babbs; R L W Corwin
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2013-03-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.