Literature DB >> 9809686

What should men know about prostate-specific antigen screening before giving informed consent?

E C Chan1, D P Sulmasy.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Since prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening is controversial, some authorities recommend that patients give informed consent before testing. We identified and compared what facts experts and patients thought men should know. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We recruited a Delphi panel of national experts (6 urologists and 6 non-urologists) and conducted 6 focus groups of couples (48 subjects) with 24 screened and unscreened men from a university hospital. We ranked key facts that experts and couples thought men ought to know before consenting to PSA screening and conducted a multidisciplinary focus group to help interpret the findings.
RESULTS: All participants would disclose that false positive and false negative results can occur and that it is not known whether PSA screening reduces prostate cancer mortality. The 12 experts would disclose the uncertain benefits of treating early, localized prostate cancer. All 24 couples would disclose that the PSA test is a blood test and that patients may worry about results. The 6 urologists would disclose that prostate cancer is often incurable when symptoms appear; the 6 non-urologists, that it can be asymptomatic. The 12 couples with screened men would disclose that the PSA test can detect cancer sooner than the digital rectal examination; the 12 couples with unscreened men, that PSA testing is controversial.
CONCLUSIONS: Physicians and patients agree upon some facts that men should know about PSA screening before giving informed consent. However, physicians fail to emphasize other facts that patients find important. Physicians may differ by expertise; patients, by experience. Our findings provide content for informed consent for PSA screening, and our method may be useful for other controversial tests.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9809686     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(98)00257-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  27 in total

Review 1.  Informed consent for clinical treatment.

Authors:  Daniel E Hall; Allan V Prochazka; Aaron S Fink
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Serum cytokines and critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency.

Authors:  Yong Soo Kwon; Gee Young Suh; Kyeongman Jeon; So Young Park; So Yeon Lim; Won-Jung Koh; Man Pyo Chung; Hojoong Kim; O Jung Kwon
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Low-literacy interventions to promote discussion of prostate cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sunil Kripalani; Jyoti Sharma; Elizabeth Justice; Jeb Justice; Cynthia Spiker; Larry E Laufman; Megan Price; Armin D Weinberg; Terry A Jacobson
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Moving towards shared decision making in prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Richard M Hoffman; Deborah L Helitzer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Applicability of a video intervention to increase informed decision making for prostate-specific antigen testing.

Authors:  Levi Ross; Alicestine D Ashford; Sherese J Bleechington; Tyra Dark; Deborah O Erwin
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.798

6.  Beliefs and expectations of women under 50 years old regarding screening mammography: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Larissa Nekhlyudov; Dennis Ross-Degnan; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Women's accounts of consenting to surgery: is consent a quality problem?

Authors:  M Habiba; C Jackson; A Akkad; S Kenyon; M Dixon-Woods
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-12

8.  A structured implicit abstraction method to evaluate whether content of counseling before prostate cancer screening is consistent with recommendations by experts.

Authors:  Michael H Farrell; Evelyn C Y Chan; Lynnea K Ladouceur; Jeffrey M Stein
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-10-17

9.  Agreement between prostate cancer patients and their clinicians about utilities and attribute importance.

Authors:  Arthur S Elstein; Gretchen B Chapman; Joan S Chmiel; Sara J Knight; Cheeling Chan; Robert B Nadler; Timothy M Kuzel; Amy K Siston; Charles L Bennett
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  African American men, prostate cancer screening and informed decision making.

Authors:  Denethia B Sellers; Louie E Ross
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.798

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.