Literature DB >> 9809330

The Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS) in oncological consultations: psychometric properties.

L M Ong1, M R Visser, I P Kruyver, J M Bensing, A van den Brink-Muinen, J M Stouthard, F B Lammes, J C de Haes.   

Abstract

One of the most frequently used systems to analyse doctor-patient communication is the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS). However, it has mostly been applied and evaluated in primary care settings. Two studies are presented in which the psychometric properties of the RIAS are investigated in an oncological setting. In the first study (N = 25) the feasibility, inter-rater reliability and content validity of the RIAS was investigated. In the second study, we evaluated the discriminant validity of the RIAS. Results of the first study showed that coding of tapes was more time consuming than indicated by the Roter manual. The inter-rater reliability proved to be high for both physician communication (0.68-1) and patient communication (0.60-1). The content validity proved to be acceptable: all utterances could be classified. However, coding dilemmas regarding affective communication occurred. The RIAS provided no option to classify communication of a third person present. Some communication categories were never or rarely used. Results of the second study indicate that the RIAS was able to discriminate between communicative behaviors in oncological consultations (N = 60) and three different GP-samples (random-GP sample N = 329, hypertension sample N = 103, gynaecology sample N = 65). To conclude, the psychometric properties of the RIAS are satisfactory in an oncological setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9809330     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1611(1998090)7:5<387::AID-PON316>3.0.CO;2-G

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  22 in total

1.  Who is responsible? The role of family physicians in the provision of supportive cancer care.

Authors:  Kevin Brazil; Jonathan Sussman; Daryl Bainbridge; Tim Whelan
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  The impact of individual quality of life assessment on psychosocial attention in patients with chest malignancies: a randomized study.

Authors:  Mercedes Nicklasson; Magnus L Elfström; Jan Olofson; Bengt Bergman
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Assessment of pharmacy students' communication competence using the Roter Interaction Analysis System during objective structured clinical examinations.

Authors:  Yoshie Kubota; Yoshitaka Yano; Susumu Seki; Kaori Takada; Mio Sakuma; Takeshi Morimoto; Akinori Akaike; Atsushi Hiraide
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Fears, Uncertainties, and Hopes: Patient-Initiated Actions and Doctors' Responses During Oncology Interviews.

Authors:  Wayne A Beach; David M Dozier
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2015-07-02

5.  Investigator Disclosure and Advanced Cancer Patient Understanding of Informed Consent and Prognosis in Phase I Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Fay J Hlubocky; Nancy E Kass; Debra Roter; Susan Larson; Kristen E Wroblewski; Jeremy Sugarman; Christopher K Daugherty
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 3.840

6.  Communication patterns of primary care physicians in the United States and the Netherlands.

Authors:  Jozien M Bensing; Debra L Roter; Robert L Hulsman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Open and hidden agendas of "asymptomatic" patients who request check-up exams.

Authors:  Sabina Hunziker; Martin Schläpfer; Wolf Langewitz; Gilbert Kaufmann; Reto Nüesch; Edouard Battegay; Lukas U Zimmerli
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  Does burnout among doctors affect their involvement in patients' mental health problems? A study of videotaped consultations.

Authors:  Else M Zantinge; Peter F M Verhaak; Dinny H de Bakker; Klaas van der Meer; Jozien M Bensing
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  Effectiveness of the ACA (Availability, Current issues and Anticipation) training programme on GP-patient communication in palliative care; a controlled trial.

Authors:  Willemjan Slort; Annette H Blankenstein; Bart P M Schweitzer; Dirk L Knol; Luc Deliens; Neil K Aaronson; Henriëtte E van der Horst
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 10.  Communication skills training for healthcare professionals working with people who have cancer.

Authors:  Philippa M Moore; Solange Rivera; Gonzalo A Bravo-Soto; Camila Olivares; Theresa A Lawrie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-07-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.