Literature DB >> 9807613

Obstetricians' knowledge and attitudes toward epidural analgesia in labour.

N M Vandendriesen1, W Lim, M J Paech, C Michael.   

Abstract

A survey of all registered obstetrician/gynaecologists in Western Australia (n = 79) was conducted to obtain information regarding their level of knowledge about epidural analgesia (EA) in labour and its complications, their sources of information about EA, and their opinions regarding its role in labour and effect on progress of labour. Response rate was 68%. Most respondents had only received lectures about EA after specialist training and 20% did not achieve an adequate knowledge score. Those of less than five years' experience achieved significantly better scores. Over a third did not favour EA in labour until active labour was established, though 90% would recommend it by late first stage in those with a potentially complicated delivery. For women with cardiac or significant medical disease aggravated by labour, 18% would wait until the late first or second stage before suggesting EA. Seventy-seven per cent believed EA prolonged the second stage of labour, though opinion varied regarding EA effects on the duration and progress of first and third stages. Up to thirty minutes delay before epidural placement is acceptable to 87%. This survey suggests that there is both a demand and a need for greater education about EA in labour, particularly with respect to EA side-effects, complications and effects on labour, in the subgroup of obstetricians who have been in obstetric practice more than five years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9807613     DOI: 10.1177/0310057X9802600514

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care        ISSN: 0310-057X            Impact factor:   1.669


  5 in total

1.  Does labour epidural slow the progress of labour and lead to complications? Obstetricians' perception working in private and public sector teaching hospitals in a developing country.

Authors:  Muhammad Sohaib; Samina Ismail
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2015-12

2.  Satisfaction as a Mediator and Its Interaction With Adherence to Labor Analgesia Protocols: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Chinese Medical Personnel.

Authors:  Dong Lang; Chengxu Long; Shuna Lin; Yinghua Xie; Fangfei Chen; Rui Zhao; Chunping Liu; Shangfeng Tang
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-06-28

3.  Healthcare Providers' Knowledge and Current Practice of Pain Assessment and Management: How Much Progress Have We Made?

Authors:  Khawla Nuseir; Manal Kassab; Basima Almomani
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 3.037

4.  Perceptions and practice of epidural analgesia among women attending antenatal clinic in FETHA.

Authors:  Paul O Ezeonu; Okechukwu Bonaventure Anozie; Fidelis A Onu; Chidi U Esike; Johnbosco E Mamah; Lucky O Lawani; Robinson C Onoh; Emmanuel Okechukwu Ndukwe; Richard Lawrence Ewah; Rita Onyinyechi Anozie
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2017-12-12

5.  [Combined spinal-epidural block for labor analgesia. Comparative study with continuous epidural block].

Authors:  Angélica de Fátima de Assunção Braga; Vanessa Henriques Carvalho; Franklin Sarmento da Silva Braga; Rosa Inês Costa Pereira
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-09-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.