PURPOSE: To compare various subjective, empiric, and pharmacokinetic methods for interpreting findings at dynamic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the breast. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dynamic spiral breast MR imaging was performed in 52 women suspected of having or with known breast disease. Gadolinium-enhanced images were obtained at 12 locations through the whole breast every 7.8 seconds for 8.5 minutes after bolus injection of contrast material. Time-signal intensity curves from regions of interest corresponding to 57 pathologically proved lesions were analyzed by means of a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model, and the diagnostic performance of various parameters was analyzed. RESULTS: Findings included invasive carcinoma in 17 patients, isolated ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in six, and benign lesions in 34. Although some overlap between carcinomas and benign diagnoses was noted for all parameters, receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated that the exchange rate constant had the greatest overall ability to discriminate benign and malignant disease. The elimination rate constant and washout were the most specific parameters. The exchange rate constant, wash-in, and extrapolation point were the most sensitive parameters. DCIS was not consistently distinguished from benign disease with any method. CONCLUSION: Dynamic spiral breast MR imaging proved an excellent method with which to collect contrast enhancement data rapidly enough that accurate comparisons can be made between many analytic methods.
PURPOSE: To compare various subjective, empiric, and pharmacokinetic methods for interpreting findings at dynamic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the breast. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dynamic spiral breast MR imaging was performed in 52 women suspected of having or with known breast disease. Gadolinium-enhanced images were obtained at 12 locations through the whole breast every 7.8 seconds for 8.5 minutes after bolus injection of contrast material. Time-signal intensity curves from regions of interest corresponding to 57 pathologically proved lesions were analyzed by means of a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model, and the diagnostic performance of various parameters was analyzed. RESULTS: Findings included invasive carcinoma in 17 patients, isolated ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in six, and benign lesions in 34. Although some overlap between carcinomas and benign diagnoses was noted for all parameters, receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated that the exchange rate constant had the greatest overall ability to discriminate benign and malignant disease. The elimination rate constant and washout were the most specific parameters. The exchange rate constant, wash-in, and extrapolation point were the most sensitive parameters. DCIS was not consistently distinguished from benign disease with any method. CONCLUSION: Dynamic spiral breast MR imaging proved an excellent method with which to collect contrast enhancement data rapidly enough that accurate comparisons can be made between many analytic methods.
Authors: A C Schmitz; N H G M Peters; W B Veldhuis; A M Fernandez Gallardo; P J van Diest; G Stapper; R van Hillegersberg; W P Th M Mali; M A A J van den Bosch Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2007-09-20 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Kathleen C Horst; Katherine E Fero; Steven L Hancock; Ranjana H Advani; Debra M Ikeda; Bruce Daniel; Saul A Rosenberg; Sarah S Donaldson; Richard T Hoppe Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: Daniel I Golden; Jafi A Lipson; Melinda L Telli; James M Ford; Daniel L Rubin Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-06-19 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Sharareh Siamakpour-Reihani; Kouros Owzar; Chen Jiang; Peter M Scarbrough; Oana I Craciunescu; Janet K Horton; Holly K Dressman; Kimberly L Blackwell; Mark W Dewhirst Journal: Int J Hyperthermia Date: 2015-03-26 Impact factor: 3.914
Authors: M A A J van den Bosch; B L Daniel; S Pal; K W Nowels; R L Birdwell; S S Jeffrey; D M Ikeda Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2006-05-09 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Ergys Subashi; Everett J Moding; Gary P Cofer; James R MacFall; David G Kirsch; Yi Qi; G Allan Johnson Journal: Med Phys Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Hye Young Choi; Sun Mi Kim; Mijung Jang; Bo La Yun; Sung-Won Kim; Eunyoung Kang; So Yeon Park; Woo Kyung Moon; Eun Sook Ko Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2013-02-22 Impact factor: 3.500