U B Fritz1, W J Finger, H Stean. 1. Department of Operative Dentistry, Dental School, University of Cologne, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The effect of salivary contamination of enamel and dentin on bonding efficacy of an experimental one-bottle resin adhesive was investigated. METHOD AND MATERIALS: The adhesive was a light-curing urethane dimethacrylate/hydroxyethyl methacrylate/4-methacryloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride mixture dissolved in acetone. Evaluation parameters were shear bond strength and marginal gap width in a dental cavity. Apart from a control group without contamination (group 1), etched enamel and dentin were (2) contaminated with saliva and air dried; (3) contaminated, rinsed, and blot dried; (4) coated with adhesive, contaminated, rinsed, and blot dried; (5) coated with adhesive, light cured, contaminated, rinsed, and air dried; or (6) treated as in group 5, with additional adhesive application after air drying. RESULTS: There was no negative effect in groups 3 and 4, compared with control. Air drying after salivary contamination (group 2) resulted in low shear bond strengths and wide marginal gaps. Contamination of the cured adhesive layer (groups 5 and 6) had no adverse effect on enamel shear bond strengths, but resulted in 50% reduced dentin shear bond strengths and wide marginal gaps. CONCLUSION: The one-bottle adhesive system is relatively insensitive to salivary contamination, provided that the contamination occurs prior to light curing of the adhesive and is carefully rinsed and blot dried. Salivary contact after adhesive curing must be avoided.
OBJECTIVE: The effect of salivary contamination of enamel and dentin on bonding efficacy of an experimental one-bottle resin adhesive was investigated. METHOD AND MATERIALS: The adhesive was a light-curing urethane dimethacrylate/hydroxyethyl methacrylate/4-methacryloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride mixture dissolved in acetone. Evaluation parameters were shear bond strength and marginal gap width in a dental cavity. Apart from a control group without contamination (group 1), etched enamel and dentin were (2) contaminated with saliva and air dried; (3) contaminated, rinsed, and blot dried; (4) coated with adhesive, contaminated, rinsed, and blot dried; (5) coated with adhesive, light cured, contaminated, rinsed, and air dried; or (6) treated as in group 5, with additional adhesive application after air drying. RESULTS: There was no negative effect in groups 3 and 4, compared with control. Air drying after salivary contamination (group 2) resulted in low shear bond strengths and wide marginal gaps. Contamination of the cured adhesive layer (groups 5 and 6) had no adverse effect on enamel shear bond strengths, but resulted in 50% reduced dentin shear bond strengths and wide marginal gaps. CONCLUSION: The one-bottle adhesive system is relatively insensitive to salivary contamination, provided that the contamination occurs prior to light curing of the adhesive and is carefully rinsed and blot dried. Salivary contact after adhesive curing must be avoided.
Authors: Lilliam Marie Pinzon; John M Powers; Kathy L O'Keefe; Vladimir Dusevish; Paulette Spencer; Grayson W Marshall Journal: Odontology Date: 2011-04-23 Impact factor: 2.634
Authors: Antarmayee Panigrahi; K T Srilatha; Rajat G Panigrahi; Susant Mohanty; Sanat K Bhuyan; Debojyoti Bardhan Journal: J Clin Diagn Res Date: 2015-07-01
Authors: Philipp Pierdzioch; Stefan Hartwig; Sascha R Herbst; Jan Dirk Raguse; Henrik Dommisch; Shady Abu-Sirhan; Henrik C Wirtz; Moritz Hertel; Sebastian Paris; Saskia Preissner Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2016-01-19 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Ellen Cristina de Carvalho Mendonça; Samuel Nilo Vieira; Fernando Aparecido Kawaguchi; John Powers; Adriana Bona Matos Journal: Eur J Dent Date: 2010-07