B Tarim1, A A Hafez, C F Cox. 1. Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Turkey.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the biocompatibility of a resin-modified glass-ionomer material on monkey pulps. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Standardized Class V cavities were prepared in 112 teeth distributed in six healthy adult monkeys. The resin-modified glass-ionomer cement was placed in 24 nonexposed and 36 exposed pulps according to manufacturer's instructions. ZOE was used as a control in nonexposed pulps, while calcium hydroxide was used as a control for exposed pulps. Tissues were collected at 6 to 7, 21 to 27, and 90 to 97 days. After demineralization, the teeth were serially sectioned, stained, and observed by light microscopy. RESULTS: Except for one resin-modified glass-ionomer pulp at 6 days, there were no differences between the responses of nonexposed pulps to resin-modified glass-ionomer specimens and ZOE controls. In exposed pulps, eight of 36 resin-modified glass-ionomer pulps showed various grades of inflammatory response, all associated with stained bacteria. Pulpal healing was similar in both resin-modified glass-ionomer and calcium hydroxide direct-capped exposures. Twenty-two of 26 exposed pulps restored with the resin-modified glass-ionomer cement showed dentin bridge formation at 21 and 97 days. CONCLUSION: The resin-modified glass-ionomer material exhibited acceptable biologic compatibility in exposed and nonexposed cavities.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the biocompatibility of a resin-modified glass-ionomer material on monkey pulps. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Standardized Class V cavities were prepared in 112 teeth distributed in six healthy adult monkeys. The resin-modified glass-ionomer cement was placed in 24 nonexposed and 36 exposed pulps according to manufacturer's instructions. ZOE was used as a control in nonexposed pulps, while calcium hydroxide was used as a control for exposed pulps. Tissues were collected at 6 to 7, 21 to 27, and 90 to 97 days. After demineralization, the teeth were serially sectioned, stained, and observed by light microscopy. RESULTS: Except for one resin-modified glass-ionomer pulp at 6 days, there were no differences between the responses of nonexposed pulps to resin-modified glass-ionomer specimens and ZOE controls. In exposed pulps, eight of 36 resin-modified glass-ionomer pulps showed various grades of inflammatory response, all associated with stained bacteria. Pulpal healing was similar in both resin-modified glass-ionomer and calcium hydroxide direct-capped exposures. Twenty-two of 26 exposed pulps restored with the resin-modified glass-ionomer cement showed dentin bridge formation at 21 and 97 days. CONCLUSION: The resin-modified glass-ionomer material exhibited acceptable biologic compatibility in exposed and nonexposed cavities.
Authors: Minju Song; Bo Yu; Sol Kim; Marc Hayashi; Colby Smith; Suhjin Sohn; Euiseong Kim; James Lim; Richard G Stevenson; Reuben H Kim Journal: Dent Clin North Am Date: 2017-01