Literature DB >> 24431735

Invivo comparative evaluation of tertiary dentin deposit to three different luting cements a histopathological study.

P B Yogesh1, M Preethi2, Hari Babu3, N Malathi4.   

Abstract

The aim of the study is to evaluate histopathologically the amount of tertiary dentin deposit stimulated by three different luting cements. With the informed consent for fifteen patients crown preparation was done for maxillary and mandibular premolar teeth which were scheduled for orthodontic extraction. Copings were cemented with three different luting cements zinc oxide eugenol, glass ionomer and zinc polycarboxylate which were classified as Groups A, B and C respectively. The teeth were later extracted and histopathologically analysed for pulpodentinal reactions using a control study group. Statistically Tukey-HSD procedure was used to identify the significant group and one way ANNOVA was used to analyse the thickness of tertiary dentin among the study group. Tertiary dentin was seen in most of the specimens. When the three groups were compared zinc oxide eugenol helps in stimulation of tertiary dentin formation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decalcification; Tertiary dentin; Zinc oxide eugenol

Year:  2012        PMID: 24431735      PMCID: PMC3732735          DOI: 10.1007/s13191-012-0205-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc        ISSN: 0972-4052


  17 in total

1.  Reparative dentin: factors affecting its deposition.

Authors:  C F Cox; K C White; D L Ramus; J B Farmer; H M Snuggs
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 1.677

2.  Pulpal response to a resin-modified glass-ionomer material on nonexposed and exposed monkey pulps.

Authors:  B Tarim; A A Hafez; C F Cox
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.677

3.  A study of the dentinal permeability of the pulp chamber floor of human lower molars with separate roots.

Authors:  J D Pécora; W F Costa; G Maia Campos
Journal:  Braz Dent J       Date:  1990

4.  Rate of formation of tertiary dentin in dogs' teeth in response to lining materials.

Authors:  V Ivanovic; A Santini
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1989-06

5.  Monkey pulp reactions to restorative materials.

Authors:  P B Hörsted; A M Simonsen; M J Larsen
Journal:  Scand J Dent Res       Date:  1986-04

6.  Pulpal responses to two luting cements.

Authors:  C F Valcke; P E Cleaton-Jones; J C Austin; M Forbes; C Sam
Journal:  J Dent Assoc S Afr       Date:  1982-12

7.  Odontoblast stimulation in ferrets by dentine matrix components.

Authors:  A J Smith; R S Tobias; N Cassidy; C G Plant; R M Browne; C Begue-Kirn; J V Ruch; H Lesot
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.633

8.  Bacterial microleakage and pulp inflammation associated with various restorative materials.

Authors:  Peter E Murray; Abeer A Hafez; Anthony J Smith; Charles F Cox
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.304

Review 9.  Reactionary dentinogenesis.

Authors:  A J Smith; N Cassidy; H Perry; C Bègue-Kirn; J V Ruch; H Lesot
Journal:  Int J Dev Biol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.203

10.  Inductive effect of native dentin on the dentinogenic potential of adult dog teeth.

Authors:  D Tziafas; T Lambrianidis; P Beltes
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.171

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.