Literature DB >> 9803331

Ventilatory care in a selection of Ontario hospitals: bigger is not necessarily better! Critical Care Research Network (CCR-Net).

S P Keenan1, J Montgomery, L M Chen, R Esmail, K J Inman, W J Sibbald.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is variability in the structure and process of ventilatory care in intensive care units (ICUs) of the hospitals of Southwestern Ontario.
DESIGN: Self-administered questionnaire-based survey.
SETTING: ICUs of selected community and teaching hospitals of Southwestern Ontario. PARTICIPANTS: Head of respiratory therapy service of respective hospitals; in those hospitals without respiratory therapists, the ICU nurse manager. INTERVENTION: Self-administered questionnaire. OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The availability of different models of ventilators and respiratory therapist and physician coverage were assessed. In addition, the use of clinical practice guidelines, respiratory therapists, and the nursing role in ventilatory care were determined.
RESULTS: In general, the structure of ventilatory care, including availability of different modes of ventilation, and coverage by respiratory therapists and physicians was more comprehensive in larger hospitals. However, the availability of some modes of ventilation varied more than expected among hospitals of comparable size. Similarly, variability in the process of ventilatory care, defined by the availability of clinical practice guidelines and the roles of respiratory therapists varied both within and among hospitals of different size.
CONCLUSIONS: The structure and process of ventilatory care in this sample of Southwestern Ontario ICUs was found to be variable. Not all this variability could be accounted for by hospital size, suggesting a potential for improvement in overall ventilatory care. Further study is required before any specific recommendations can be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9803331     DOI: 10.1007/s001340050694

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  22 in total

1.  Assessing the efficiency of the admission process to a critical care unit: does the literature allow the use of benchmarking?

Authors:  S P Keenan; G S Doig; C M Martin; K J Inman; W J Sibbald
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Health services research: reporting on studies using secondary data sources.

Authors:  P Huston; C D Naylor
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-12-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Prone position in mechanically ventilated patients with severe acute respiratory failure.

Authors:  G Chatte; J M Sab; J M Dubois; M Sirodot; P Gaussorgues; D Robert
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 21.405

4.  Effect of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation on mortality in patients admitted with acute respiratory failure: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  S P Keenan; P D Kernerman; D J Cook; C M Martin; D McCormack; W J Sibbald
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Medical practice guidelines: current activities and future directions.

Authors:  A M Audet; S Greenfield; M Field
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1990-11-01       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 6.  Mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  M J Tobin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-04-14       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Benchmarking: a performance intervention tool.

Authors:  A B Campbell
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv       Date:  1994-05

8.  Effect on the duration of mechanical ventilation of identifying patients capable of breathing spontaneously.

Authors:  E W Ely; A M Baker; D P Dunagan; H L Burke; A C Smith; P T Kelly; M M Johnson; R W Browder; D L Bowton; E F Haponik
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-12-19       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Inhaled nitric oxide for the adult respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  R Rossaint; K J Falke; F López; K Slama; U Pison; W M Zapol
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-02-11       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Critical pathways as a strategy for improving care: problems and potential.

Authors:  S D Pearson; D Goulart-Fisher; T H Lee
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1995-12-15       Impact factor: 25.391

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.