Literature DB >> 9803001

Treatment of varicocele for male infertility: a comparative study evaluating currently used approaches.

G A Barbalias1, E N Liatsikos, G Nikiforidis, D Siablis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of four currently used approaches for the treatment of clinically diagnosed varicoceles, and compare their influence on semen parameters.
METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 88 patients, 23-39 years old (mean age 31), with a clinically diagnosed varicocele. Patients were allocated randomly to be treated either by a retroperitoneal (group A), inguinal (group B), subinguinal (group C), or percutaneous venous embolization approaches (group D). All patients were evaluated 6 and 12 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: Clinical recurrence of varicocele occurred in 4 patients of group A (18.2%), 1 patient of group B (4.5%), and 2 patients of group D (9.1%). Hydrocele formation was seen in 1 patient of group B (4.5%), and 2 patients of group C (9.1%). In all groups statistically significant improvement as to the sperm concentration was found in both the 6- and 12-month follow-up. This significance was more prominent in group C followed by groups B and D, and finally by group A. As to sperm motility, in group C there was a statistical significance in both follow-up evaluations, and in group B statistical difference was reached only in the 12-month evaluation. Sperm morphology did not differ in any of the groups postoperatively compared to the preoperative values.
CONCLUSIONS: The subinguinal approach disclosed a more prominent improvement in both semen concentration and motility in the 6- and 12-month follow-up evaluation when compared to the other techniques. Furthermore, due to its simplicity and avoidance of opening the external oblique fascia, we believe it represents the more plausible approach when treating clinical varicocele.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9803001     DOI: 10.1159/000019772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  6 in total

Review 1.  The great debate: varicocele treatment and impact on fertility.

Authors:  Matthew A Will; Jason Swain; Mikkel Fode; Jens Sonksen; Gregory M Christman; Dana Ohl
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  A case of scrotal venous malformation mimicking a failed varicocelectomy.

Authors:  Chong K Yi; Raffaella Derosa; Joseph R Sterbis; Brian H Ching
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-03-20

3.  Gonadal vein embolization: treatment of varicocele and pelvic congestion syndrome.

Authors:  Mark A Bittles; Eric K Hoffer
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  Comparison of three different embolic materials for varicocele embolization: retrospective study of tolerance, radiation and recurrence rate.

Authors:  Nicolas Favard; Morgan Moulin; Patricia Fauque; Aurélie Bertaut; Sylvain Favelier; Louis Estivalet; Frédéric Michel; Luc Cormier; Paul Sagot; Romaric Loffroy
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2015-12

5.  Surgical or radiological treatment for varicoceles in subfertile men.

Authors:  Emma Persad; Clare Aa O'Loughlin; Simi Kaur; Gernot Wagner; Nina Matyas; Melanie Rosalia Hassler-Di Fratta; Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-04-23

6.  Inguinal and subinguinal micro-varicocelectomy, the optimal surgical management of varicocele: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jun Wang; Shu-Jie Xia; Zhi-Hong Liu; Le Tao; Ji-Fu Ge; Chen-Min Xu; Jian-Xin Qiu
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.