Literature DB >> 9802503

Classification system based on kinematic MR imaging in cervical spondylitic myelopathy.

C Muhle1, J Metzner, D Weinert, A Falliner, G Brinkmann, M H Mehdorn, M Heller, D Resnick.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Functional myelographic studies are often used to evaluate the dynamic changes of the cervical spinal canal during flexion and extension. The purposes of this study were to use kinematic MR imaging to assess the dynamic changes of the cervical spine in patients at different stages of degenerative disease and to describe a classification system based on static and dynamic factors in the pathogenesis of cervical spondylitic myelopathy.
METHODS: Eighty-one patients with different stages (I-IV) of degenerative disease of the cervical spine were examined with MR imaging. In the neutral position (0 degrees) and at maximum flexion and extension, spinal stenosis was classified for each segment according to the following grading system: 0 = normal, 1 = partial obliteration of the anterior or posterior subarachnoid space, 2 = complete obliteration of the anterior or posterior subarachnoid space, and 3 = cervical cord compression or displacement.
RESULTS: At flexion and extension, the prevalence of spinal stenosis and cervical cord impingement increased as the stage of degenerative disease progressed. With regard to a pincer effect (anterior and posterior cord impingement) and cord encroachment at multiple segments, statistically significant differences were observed at stages III and IV as compared with stages I and II. Significant increase in cord impingement was seen in 22 (27%) of 81 patients at extension, as compared with four (5%) of 81 patients at flexion.
CONCLUSION: Regardless of the stage of degenerative disease and grade of spinal stenosis at the neutral position (0 degrees), cervical spinal motion may contribute to the development of cervical spondylitic myelopathy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9802503      PMCID: PMC8337474     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  30 in total

1.  MRI of the cervical spine with neck extension: is it useful?

Authors:  R J V Bartlett; C A Rowland Hill; A S Rigby; S Chandrasekaran; H Narayanamurthy
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Diffusion tensor imaging and fibre tracking in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Jean-François Budzik; Vincent Balbi; Vianney Le Thuc; Alain Duhamel; Richard Assaker; Anne Cotten
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  3D T2 MR Imaging-Based Measurements of the Posterior Cervical Thecal Sac in Flexion and Extension for Cervical Puncture.

Authors:  M P Bazylewicz; F Berkowitz; A Sayah
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Impact of cervical stenosis on multiple sclerosis lesion distribution in the spinal cord.

Authors:  Daniel Gratch; David Do; Pouya Khankhanian; Matthew Schindler; J Eric Schmitt; Joseph R Berger
Journal:  Mult Scler Relat Disord       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 4.339

5.  Stress analysis of the cervical spinal cord: Impact of the morphology of spinal cord segments on stress.

Authors:  Norihiro Nishida; Tsukasa Kanchiku; Yasuaki Imajo; Hidenori Suzuki; Yuichiro Yoshida; Yoshihiko Kato; Daisuke Nakashima; Toshihiko Taguchi
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 1.985

6.  Comparison of inter- and intra-observer reliability among the three classification systems for cervical spinal canal stenosis.

Authors:  Sangbong Ko; Wonkee Choi; Seungbum Chae
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  A practical radiographic visual estimation technique for the prediction of developmental narrowing of cervical spinal canal.

Authors:  Erdem Toslak Iclal; Laurie M Lomasney; Nathaniel S Jones; Bartosz Wojewnik; Amany Aziz; Khalid Alsabban; William Adams
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Effect of the number of involved spinal cord segments on gait function in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Ji Yeon Yoon; Han Chang; Kun Bo Park; Sang Jin Lee; Byung Wan Choi
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2012-12-14

Review 9.  Role of Diffusion Tensor MR Imaging in Degenerative Cervical Spine Disease: a Review of the Literature.

Authors:  A Banaszek; J Bladowska; P Podgórski; M J Sąsiadek
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.649

10.  Usefulness of diffusion tensor MR imaging in the assessment of intramedullary changes of the cervical spinal cord in different stages of degenerative spine disease.

Authors:  Anna Banaszek; Joanna Bladowska; Paweł Szewczyk; Przemysław Podgórski; Marek Sąsiadek
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-05-11       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.