Literature DB >> 9802248

Bioaccumulation of mercury in pelagic freshwater food webs.

C J Watras1, R C Back, S Halvorsen, R J Hudson, K A Morrison, S P Wente.   

Abstract

Current paradigms regarding the bioaccumulation of mercury are rooted in observations that monomethyl mercury (meHg) biomagnifies along pelagic food chains. However, mechanisms regulating the formation of meHg, its initial incorporation at the base of pelagic food chains, and its subsequent trophic transfer remain controversial. Here we use field data from 15 northern Wisconsin lakes, equilibrium aqueous speciation modeling, and statistical modeling to revisit several hypotheses about the uptake, distribution, and fate of inorganic Hg (HgII) and meHg in aquatic biota. Our field data comprise determinations of total Hg (HgT) and meHg in surface waters, sediments, microseston, zooplankton, and small fish in each of the study lakes. For these lake waters, strong positive correlations between DOC and aqueous concentrations of mercury along with negative correlations between DOC and the seston-water partitioning of mercury indicate that organic ligands bind HgII and meHg strongly enough to dominate their apparent aqueous speciation. In the microseston, zooplankton and fish, meHg concentrations and bioaccumulation factors (BAFs) increased with increasing trophic level while biotic concentrations of HgII decreased--indicating that meHg was indeed the biomagnified species of mercury. For all trophic levels, meHg concentrations varied positively with the calculated aqueous concentration of meHg+ (free ion), especially when coupled with pH, or meHgOH (hydroxide) species but not with meHgCl0, the neutral chloride complex. These findings suggest that: (1) the passive uptake of meHg does not control bioaccumulation at the base of aquatic food webs in nature (i.e. phyto- and bacterioplankton); (2) correlation with pH and DOC largely reflect the supply and bioavailability of meHg to lower trophic levels; and (3) meHg concentrations at higher trophic levels reflect uptake at low trophic levels and other factors, such as diet and growth. Low concentrations of meHg in surficial sediments indicate that the fates of biotic HgII and meHg are different. Most biotic meHg is demethylated rather than buried in lake sediments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9802248     DOI: 10.1016/s0048-9697(98)00228-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  62 in total

1.  Interspecific and intraspecific variation in selenium:mercury molar ratios in saltwater fish from the Aleutians: potential protection on mercury toxicity by selenium.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Michael Gochfeld; Christian Jeitner; Mark Donio; Taryn Pittfield
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 2.  Bioaccumulation syndrome: identifying factors that make some stream food webs prone to elevated mercury bioaccumulation.

Authors:  Darren M Ward; Keith H Nislow; Carol L Folt
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Selenium and mercury molar ratios in saltwater fish from New Jersey: individual and species variability complicate use in human health fish consumption advisories.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Michael Gochfeld
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 6.498

4.  Microcrustaceans escape behavior as an early bioindicator of copper, chromium and endosulfan toxicity.

Authors:  María Florencia Gutierrez; Juan César Paggi; Ana María Gagneten
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Ecological and biological determinants of methylmercury accumulation in tropical coastal fish.

Authors:  Tércia G Seixas; Isabel Moreira; Olaf Malm; Helena A Kehrig
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Patterns of Hg bioaccumulation and transfer in aquatic food webs across multi-lake studies in the northeast US.

Authors:  Celia Y Chen; Richard S Stemberger; Neil C Kamman; Brandon M Mayes; Carol L Folt
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Heavy metal contents in whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus) along a pollution gradient in a subarctic watercourse.

Authors:  Per-Arne Amundsen; Nikolay A Kashulin; Petr Terentjev; Karl Øystein Gjelland; Irina M Koroleva; Vladimir A Dauvalter; Sergey Sandimirov; Alexander Kashulin; Rune Knudsen
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Altered gill morphology in benthic macroinvertebrates from mercury enriched streams in the Neversink Reservoir Watershed, New York.

Authors:  Kathleen M Skinner; Jessica D Bennett
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 2.823

9.  Methylmercury and total mercury in estuarine organisms from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Authors:  H A Kehrig; M Costa; I Moreira; O Malm
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Mercury in tropical and subtropical coastal environments.

Authors:  Monica F Costa; William M Landing; Helena A Kehrig; Mário Barletta; Christopher D Holmes; Paulo R G Barrocas; David C Evers; David G Buck; Ana Claudia Vasconcellos; Sandra S Hacon; Josino C Moreira; Olaf Malm
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 6.498

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.