Literature DB >> 9800588

Mental incapacity: some proposals for legislative reform.

J V McHale1.   

Abstract

While the decision of the House of Lords in Re F in [1990] clarified somewhat the law concerning the treatment of the mentally incapacitated adult, many uncertainties remained. This paper explores proposals discussed in a recent government green paper for reform of the law in an area involving many difficult ethical dilemmas.

Keywords:  Airedale NHS Trust v. Bland; Death and Euthanasia; House of Lords Select Committee on Medical Ethics; Law Commission (Great Britain); Legal Approach; Mental Health Therapies; Re C (Adult: Refusal of Treatment); Re F (Mental Patient: Sterilisation); Re T (Adult: Refusal of Medical Treatment); Who Decides? Making Decisions on Behalf of Mentally Incompetent Patients

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9800588      PMCID: PMC1377608          DOI: 10.1136/jme.24.5.322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  2 in total

1.  The Law Commission's report on mental incapacity: medically vulnerable adults or politically vulnerable law?

Authors:  Petra Wilson
Journal:  Med Law Rev       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.267

2.  Misdiagnosis of the vegetative state: retrospective study in a rehabilitation unit.

Authors:  K Andrews; L Murphy; R Munday; C Littlewood
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-07-06
  2 in total
  1 in total

1.  Mental incapacity and restraint for treatment: present law and proposals for reform.

Authors:  A M Bridgman
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.903

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.