Literature DB >> 11055044

Mental incapacity and restraint for treatment: present law and proposals for reform.

A M Bridgman1.   

Abstract

The House of Lords in F v West Berkshire Health Authority [1989] considered the lawfulness of providing care and treatment for a mentally incapacitated adult. They did not, however, directly consider the use of restraint to enable the provision of care in the face of resistance from the patient. The law has since had good cause to give consideration to this important issue. This paper establishes the present law in the context of using restraint to deliver care. Although the legal principles established have derived from what might be considered to be "hard cases", life-and-death cases, they apply to all aspects of routine medical, dental and nursing care. Further, the paper considers the recent government proposals and the effect those proposals may have on the routine care of such patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Legal Approach; Mental Health Therapies; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11055044      PMCID: PMC1733279          DOI: 10.1136/jme.26.5.387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  4 in total

1.  Treatment without consent (anorexia nervosa): adult -- Riverside Mental Health Trust v. Fox.

Authors:  Andrew Grubb
Journal:  Med Law Rev       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.267

Review 2.  Mental incapacity: some proposals for legislative reform.

Authors:  J V McHale
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Impaired autonomy and rejection of treatment.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  The relationship between pain and depression.

Authors:  M Von Korff; G Simon
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry Suppl       Date:  1996-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.