Literature DB >> 9797979

Automated visual field examination in children aged 5-8 years. Part I: Experimental validation of a testing procedure.

C Tschopp1, A B Safran, P Viviani, A Bullinger, M Reicherts, C Mermoud.   

Abstract

In 106 children aged 5-8 years, we determined how much training was needed to stabilize the response strategy prior to actual visual field assessment and we evaluated the reliability and acceptable duration of automated static perimetry (Octopus 2000R). A specially designed familiarization procedure was used to train the children to: (1) gaze at the center of the visual field while paying attention to light stimuli projected onto the periphery and (2) press the buzzer only when light stimuli were perceived. The subsequent examination phase consisted of 15 successive identical blocks of 27 trials (12 stimulus trials, 12 false-positive catch-trials, and three false-negative catch-trials), and was stopped before the end if signs of fatigue appeared. Age had a marked influence both on endurance (the number of blocks performed increased significantly) and on response reliability (false-positive responses decreased between 5- and 6-year-olds). The increase in false-negative responses toward the end indicates that examination is no longer reliable, and should be stopped. We concluded that most children as young as five can undergo examination by automated static perimetry. Changes regarding learning, stimulus intensity and testing procedure are suggested in order to adapt the examination to age, level of vigilance and health condition of the children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9797979     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00368-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Conventional techniques of visual field examination: part 4 Static perimetry: interpretation--perimetric indices--follow-up--perimetry in childhood].

Authors:  U Schiefer; J Pätzold; B Wabbels; F Dannheim
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Reliability of kinetic visual field testing in children with mutation-proven retinal dystrophies: Implications for therapeutic clinical trials.

Authors:  Vaidehi S Dedania; Jerry Y Liu; Dana Schlegel; Chris A Andrews; Kari Branham; Naheed W Khan; David C Musch; John R Heckenlively; K Thiran Jayasundera
Journal:  Ophthalmic Genet       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 1.803

3.  Normal values for Octopus tendency oriented perimetry in children 7 through 13 years old.

Authors:  Sandra M Brown; Jay C Bradley; Matthias J Monhart; Deborah K Baker
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Feasibility and outcome of automated kinetic perimetry in children.

Authors:  Stephanie Wilscher; Bettina Wabbels; Birgit Lorenz
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Development of a Pediatric Visual Field Test.

Authors:  Marco A Miranda; David B Henson; Cecilia Fenerty; Susmito Biswas; Tariq Aslam
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 3.283

6.  Detection and characterisation of visual field defects using Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry in children with brain tumours.

Authors:  Ian C Murray; Conrad Schmoll; Antonios Perperidis; Harry M Brash; Alice D McTrusty; Lorraine A Cameron; Alastair G Wilkinson; Alan O Mulvihill; Brian W Fleck; Robert A Minns
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Testing the visual field of children and adults with Rarebit: The role of task repetition on sensitivity.

Authors:  Iryna Tachyla; Luca Battaglini; Michele Barollo; Simone Cosentino; Giulio Contemori; Luisa Pinello; Ambra Ciavarelli; Clara Casco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The Assessment of Visual Fields in Infants Using Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP): A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Antonios Perperidis; Alice D McTrusty; Lorraine A Cameron; Ian C Murray; Harry M Brash; Brian W Fleck; Robert A Minns; Andrew J Tatham
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.283

9.  Study of Optimal Perimetric Testing in Children (OPTIC): Feasibility, Reliability and Repeatability of Perimetry in Children.

Authors:  Dipesh E Patel; Phillippa M Cumberland; Bronwen C Walters; Isabelle Russell-Eggitt; Jugnoo S Rahi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Feasibility, Accuracy, and Repeatability of Suprathreshold Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry.

Authors:  Ian C Murray; Lorraine A Cameron; Alice D McTrusty; Antonios Perperidis; Harry M Brash; Brian W Fleck; Robert A Minns
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.283

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.