Literature DB >> 9797950

Visual acuity versus letter contrast sensitivity in early cataract.

D B Elliott1, P Situ.   

Abstract

Large and small letter contrast sensitivity and visual acuity were assessed in 37 elderly eyes (mean VA -0.01 logMAR, Snellen 6/6) and their lens opacities were categorised and graded using the LOCS III system. Large letter contrast sensitivity was often not reduced in cataract from age-matched normal values and provided limited information. Small letter contrast sensitivity was shown to be a more sensitive measure of early cataract than visual acuity and large letter contrast sensitivity. Its usefulness may be limited by its strong correlation with visual acuity (r2 = 0.70), which is the standard and traditional measure of vision in cataract.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9797950     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00382-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  12 in total

1.  Effect of yellow filter on visual acuity and contrast sensitivity under glare condition among different age groups.

Authors:  Monireh Mahjoob; Samira Heydarian; Somayyeh Koochi
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  SPARCS and Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity testing in normal controls and patients with cataract.

Authors:  L Gupta; V Cvintal; R Delvadia; Y Sun; E Erdem; C Zangalli; L Lu; S S Wizov; J Richman; E Spaeth; G L Spaeth
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Meeting the UK driving vision standards with reduced contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  S Rae; K Latham; M F Katsou
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Quantification of deficits in spatial visual function of mouse models for glaucoma.

Authors:  Stephanie L Burroughs; Simon Kaja; Peter Koulen
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Effect of cataract type and severity on visual acuity and contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  Javad Heravian Shandiz; Akbar Derakhshan; Ameneh Daneshyar; Abbas Azimi; Hadi Ostadi Moghaddam; Abbas Ali Yekta; Seyed Hosein Hoseini Yazdi; Habibollah Esmaily
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2011-01

6.  Acute effect of alcohol intake on sine-wave Cartesian and polar contrast sensitivity functions.

Authors:  M K Cavalcanti-Galdino; J A da Silva; L C Mendes; N A da Santos; M L B Simas
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 2.590

7.  The Level of Vision Necessary for Competitive Performance in Rifle Shooting: Setting the Standards for Paralympic Shooting with Vision Impairment.

Authors:  Peter M Allen; Keziah Latham; David L Mann; Rianne H J C Ravensbergen; Joy Myint
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-08

8.  Evaluation of clinical validity of the Rabin cone contrast test in normal phakic or pseudophakic eyes and severely dichromatic eyes.

Authors:  Masato Fujikawa; Sanae Muraki; Yuichi Niwa; Masahito Ohji
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 3.761

9.  Validation of an Automated Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Low-contrast Letter Acuity Test.

Authors:  Yi Pang; Lauren Sparschu; Elyse Nylin; Jingyun Wang
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.106

10.  Impact of Oncoming Headlight Glare With Cataracts: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Alex D Hwang; Merve Tuccar-Burak; Robert Goldstein; Eli Peli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-03-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.