Literature DB >> 979568

Factor analysis and multivariate scaling of anthropometric variables for the assessment of body composition.

A S Jackson, M L Pollock.   

Abstract

This study was designed to identify the body composition factors measured by skinfold fat (S), girth (G), and diameter (D) variables and to provide multivariate scaling models that measure fat (F) and lean body weight (LBW) factors. A total of 7S, 11G, and 7D measurements were determined on 83 young women (YW) and 95 young men (YM). Body density (BD) was determined by the hydrostatic technique. All variables were factor analyzed, and F and LBW were used to validate isolated factors. The YM data showed one F factor and two LBW factors. LBW factor I measured muscle mass and bone structure; LBW factor II, bone D. The YW data isolated four factors: the same three of YM plus a second F factor specific to the pelvic girdle. Factor score models were used to develop scaling strategies to measure F and LBW factors. Full models of all 27 variables and restricted models of 14 S, G, and D variables were developed; the correlations between factor scores scaled from the full and restricted models ranged from 0.84 to 0.98. The multiple correlation between factor scores calculated from the restricted models and laboratory-determined F and LBW ranged from 0.90 to 0.94 for YM and from 0.88 to 0.89 for YW. The multivariate scaling models provide a valid field method of measuring body composition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 979568     DOI: 10.1249/00005768-197600830-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports        ISSN: 0025-7990


  8 in total

1.  The relative body fat and anthropometric prediction of body density of South Australian females aged 17-35 years.

Authors:  R T Withers; K I Norton; N P Craig; M C Hartland; W Venables
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1987

Review 2.  Techniques of measurement of body composition. Part II.

Authors:  D A Brodie
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Health promotion for educators: impact on health behaviors, satisfaction, and general well-being.

Authors:  S N Blair; T R Collingwood; R Reynolds; M Smith; R D Hagan; C L Sterling
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Do the new Metropolitan Life Insurance weight-height tables correctly assess body frame and body fat relationships?

Authors:  J H Himes; C Bouchard
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Generalized equations for estimating DXA percent fat of diverse young women and men: the TIGER study.

Authors:  Daniel P O'Connor; Molly S Bray; Brian K McFarlin; Mary H Sailors; Kenneth J Ellis; Andrew S Jackson
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  Physical Activity Modifies the Association between Dietary Protein and Lean Mass of Postmenopausal Women.

Authors:  Jessica A Martinez; Betsy C Wertheim; Cynthia A Thomson; Jennifer W Bea; Robert Wallace; Matthew Allison; Linda Snetselaar; Zhao Chen; Rami Nassir; Patricia A Thompson
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 4.910

Review 7.  Body composition of spinal cord injured adults.

Authors:  P Kocina
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 11.928

8.  A simple inexpensive method for estimating underwater weight.

Authors:  T R Thomas; P L Cook
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 13.800

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.