Literature DB >> 9794053

Work incapacity from low back pain in the general population.

K B Hagen1, O Thune.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the incidence and duration of low back pain in patients from the general working population in Norway who take at least 2 weeks of compensated absence from work. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is a growing concern about the proportion and socioeconomic consequences of work absence resulting from low back pain, and exact figures on incidence and duration of work incapacity from low back pain in the general working population are needed.
METHODS: Cases were identified from files of the national medical insurance system, covering 90% of all employees in Norway. A total of 89,190 patients with low back pain were identified in 1995 and 1996, based on the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC codes L02, L03, L84 and L86). Census data were used for the denominators.
RESULTS: The estimated overall 1-year incidence was 2.27%. It was significantly higher for women (2.72%) than for men (1.91%). The incidence increased with increasing age. The median (25th-75th percentile) duration of absence for all claimants was 43 days (25th-75th percentile, 23-103). Approximately 35% of claimants returned to work after 1 month, 70% had returned after 3 months, and 85% had returned after 6 months. Thirty percent of all claimants had low back pain with radiation, and the median duration of absence for these was 59 days (25th-75th percentile, 28-152 days) versus 38 days (25th-75th percentile, 21-86 days) for claimants without radiating pain (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The results of this study reaffirm the burden of low back pain to society. The data show that the prognosis for the majority of this group of patients with low back pain, even for those with radiating symptoms, is generally good. From 6 to 20 weeks after onset, however, the return-to-work curve declined steeply among the individuals studied. Approximately 42% of those still off work after 6 months had not returned to work after 12 months, and were switched to permanent disability pension or other compensation forms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9794053     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199810010-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  18 in total

1.  High physical work load and low job satisfaction increase the risk of sickness absence due to low back pain: results of a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  W E Hoogendoorn; P M Bongers; H C W de Vet; G A M Ariëns; W van Mechelen; L M Bouter
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Early retirement and the financial assets of individuals with back problems.

Authors:  Deborah J Schofield; Rupendra N Shrestha; Richard Percival; Emily J Callander; Simon J Kelly; Megan E Passey
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-12-05       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Can we identify people at risk of non-recovery after acute occupational low back pain? Results of a review and higher-order analysis.

Authors:  Adrienne Agnello; Tim Brown; Sam Desroches; Uma Welling; Dave Walton
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 1.037

Review 4.  Prognostic factors for duration of sick leave in patients sick listed with acute low back pain: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  I A Steenstra; J H Verbeek; M W Heymans; P M Bongers
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  Risk for low back pain from different frequencies, load mass and trunk postures of lifting and carrying among female healthcare workers.

Authors:  Andreas Holtermann; Thomas Clausen; Birgit Aust; Ole Steen Mortensen; Lars L Andersen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 3.015

6.  Enhancing medical evaluations of sick-listed employees: an educational intervention to improve professional practice of physicians performing work ability assessments of employees on long-term sick leave.

Authors:  Patricia M Dekkers-Sánchez; Annette E de Wind
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.015

7.  A population study of factors associated with general practitioner consultation for non-inflammatory musculoskeletal pain.

Authors:  K B Hagen; A Bjørndal; T Uhlig; T K Kvien
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  The effectiveness of graded activity for low back pain in occupational healthcare.

Authors:  I A Steenstra; J R Anema; P M Bongers; H C W de Vet; D L Knol; W van Mechelen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-07-17       Impact factor: 4.402

9.  The prognosis of self-reported paresthesia and weakness in disc-related sciatica.

Authors:  L Grøvle; A J Haugen; B Natvig; J I Brox; M Grotle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Models of return to work for musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  Izabela Z Schultz; Anna W Stowell; Michael Feuerstein; Robert J Gatchel
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2007-02-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.