Literature DB >> 9793503

Accuracy of screening compression ultrasonography and clinical examination for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis after total hip or knee arthroplasty.

K S Robinson1, D R Anderson, M Gross, D Petrie, R Leighton, W Stanish, D Alexander, M Mitchell, W Mason, B Flemming, M Fairhurst-Vaughan, M Gent.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether compression ultrasonography or clinical examination should be considered as screening tests for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) after total hip or knee arthroplasty in patients receiving warfarin prophylaxis postoperatively.
DESIGN: A prospective cohort study.
SETTING: A single tertiary care orthopedic centre. PATIENTS: One hundred and eleven patients who underwent elective total hip or knee arthroplasty were enrolled. Postoperatively the warfarin dose was adjusted daily to maintain the international normalized ratio between 1.8 and 2.5. Eighty-six patients successfully completed the study protocol. INTERVENTION: Before they were discharged from hospital, patients were assessed for DVT by clinical examination, bilateral compression ultrasonography of the proximal venous system and bilateral contrast venography.
RESULTS: DVT was found in 29 patients (34%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 24% to 45%), and 6 patients (7%; 95% CI 3% to 15%) had proximal DVT. DVT developed in 18 (40%) of 45 patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty and in 11 (27%) of 41 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty. The sensitivity of compression ultrasonography for the diagnosis of proximal DVT was 83% (95% CI 36% to 99%) and the specificity was 98% (95% CI 91% to 99%). The positive predictive value of compression ultrasonography was 71%. In contrast, clinical examination for DVT had a sensitivity of 11% (95% CI 2% to 28%) and a positive predictive value of 25%.
CONCLUSIONS: DVT is a common complication after total hip or knee arthroplasty. Compression ultrasonography appears to be a relatively accurate noninvasive test for diagnosing postoperative proximal DVT. In contrast, clinical examination is a very insensitive test. Whether routine use of screening compression ultrasonography will reduce the morbidity of venous thromboembolism after joint arthroplasty requires confirmation in a prospective trial involving long-term follow-up of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9793503      PMCID: PMC3949774     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Surg        ISSN: 0008-428X            Impact factor:   2.089


  10 in total

1.  Monitoring for anti-Xa activity for prophylactic administration of Fondaparinux in patients with artificial joint replacement.

Authors:  Kakunoshin Yoshida; Hideo Wada; Masahiro Hasegawa; Hiroki Wakabayashi; Honami Ando; Seika Oshima; Takeshi Matsumoto; Yuji Shimokariya; Katsura Noma; Norikazu Yamada; Atsumasa Uchida; Tsutomu Nobori; Akihiro Sudo
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 2.490

2.  [Intermittent compression devices for swelling reduction and thrombosis prophylaxis--a pilot study after total hip replacement. Is the 2 hour daily minimum application sufficient?].

Authors:  G M Ivanic; I Moser; N C Homann; M Pietsch; P Kriechhammer; A Hennerbichler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Duplex ultrasonography after total hip or knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  P S Ko; W F Chan; T H Siu; A Cheng; O B Lee; J J Lam
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2003-02-05       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Natural course of asymptomatic deep venous thrombosis in hip surgery without pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in an Asian population.

Authors:  Kosuke Tsuda; Tomio Kawasaki; Nobuo Nakamura; Hideki Yoshikawa; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Incidence and risk factors for development of venous thromboembolism in Indian patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery: results of a prospective study.

Authors:  V Bagaria; N Modi; A Panghate; S Vaidya
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.401

6.  Deep venous thrombosis following different isolated lower extremity fractures: what is known about prevalences, locations, risk factors and prophylaxis?

Authors:  S Decker; M J Weaver
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 7.  A systematic review of the accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis in asymptomatic patients.

Authors:  Behrouz Kassaï; Jean-Pierre Boissel; Michel Cucherat; Sandrine Sonie; Nirav R Shah; Alain Leizorovicz
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.249

8.  Evaluation of deep vein thrombosis with multidetector row CT after orthopedic arthroplasty: a prospective study for comparison with Doppler sonography.

Authors:  Sung Su Byun; Jeong Ho Kim; Youn Jeong Kim; Yong Sun Jeon; Yong Sun Chun; Chul Hi Park; Won Hong Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.500

9.  The rate of missed diagnosis of lower-limb DVT by ultrasound amounts to 50% or so in patients without symptoms of DVT: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuhong Zhang; Haifa Xia; Yaxin Wang; Lin Chen; Shengnan Li; Idrees Ali Hussein; Yan Wu; You Shang; Shanglong Yao; Ruofei Du
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Is DVT prophylaxis necessary after oncology lower limb surgery? A pilot study.

Authors:  Vivek Ajit Singh; Lim Ming Yong; Anushya Vijayananthan
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-06-30
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.