AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate electrocardiography and echocardiography in the diagnosis of familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in children, using the genetic status as the criterion of reference. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed 35 children (<18 years) from 13 families with identified mutations: 16 were genetically affected (11.2 +/- 3 years), 19 unaffected (13.1 +/- 2.8 years). Conventional major diagnostic criteria were: left ventricular wall thickness >95% confidence interval on the echocardiogram; abnormal Q waves, left ventricular hypertrophy (voltage >95th percentile), or marked ST-T changes on the electrocardiogram. Twenty-two minor electrocardiographic and echocardiographic criteria were also analysed. Using major criteria, the specificity of the electrocardiogram and echocardiogram was excellent (100% for both) but sensitivity was particularly low (38% and 50% respectively). However, when four relevant additional criteria (QRS axis, left atrium dimension, intraventricular septum/posterior wall ratio, E/A wave ratio) were taken into account, sensitivity increased to 88% and specificity remained high (95%). CONCLUSIONS: (1) Familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy was diagnosed in only approximately 50% of genetically affected children by conventional electrocardiographic and/or echocardiographic criteria. (2) Relevant additional diagnostic criteria were selected so that nearly all children considered as healthy carriers of a mutation (based on conventional criteria) could be identified with excellent specificity.
AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate electrocardiography and echocardiography in the diagnosis of familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in children, using the genetic status as the criterion of reference. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed 35 children (<18 years) from 13 families with identified mutations: 16 were genetically affected (11.2 +/- 3 years), 19 unaffected (13.1 +/- 2.8 years). Conventional major diagnostic criteria were: left ventricular wall thickness >95% confidence interval on the echocardiogram; abnormal Q waves, left ventricular hypertrophy (voltage >95th percentile), or marked ST-T changes on the electrocardiogram. Twenty-two minor electrocardiographic and echocardiographic criteria were also analysed. Using major criteria, the specificity of the electrocardiogram and echocardiogram was excellent (100% for both) but sensitivity was particularly low (38% and 50% respectively). However, when four relevant additional criteria (QRS axis, left atrium dimension, intraventricular septum/posterior wall ratio, E/A wave ratio) were taken into account, sensitivity increased to 88% and specificity remained high (95%). CONCLUSIONS: (1) Familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy was diagnosed in only approximately 50% of genetically affected children by conventional electrocardiographic and/or echocardiographic criteria. (2) Relevant additional diagnostic criteria were selected so that nearly all children considered as healthy carriers of a mutation (based on conventional criteria) could be identified with excellent specificity.
Authors: Angie Mae Rodday; John K Triedman; Mark E Alexander; Joshua T Cohen; Stanley Ip; Jane W Newburger; Susan K Parsons; Thomas A Trikalinos; John B Wong; Laurel K Leslie Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2012-03-05 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: María Isabel Rodríguez-García; Lorenzo Monserrat; Martín Ortiz; Xusto Fernández; Laura Cazón; Lucía Núñez; Roberto Barriales-Villa; Emilia Maneiro; Elena Veira; Alfonso Castro-Beiras; Manuel Hermida-Prieto Journal: BMC Med Genet Date: 2010-04-30 Impact factor: 2.103
Authors: Felix W Friedrich; Silke Reischmann; Aileen Schwalm; Andreas Unger; Deepak Ramanujam; Julia Münch; Oliver J Müller; Christian Hengstenberg; Enrique Galve; Philippe Charron; Wolfgang A Linke; Stefan Engelhardt; Monica Patten; Pascale Richard; Jolanda van der Velden; Thomas Eschenhagen; Richard Isnard; Lucie Carrier Journal: Basic Res Cardiol Date: 2014-10-31 Impact factor: 17.165