Literature DB >> 9790188

Two-dimensional matches from one-dimensional stimulus components in human stereopsis.

B Farell1.   

Abstract

Three-dimensional visual scenes project onto the retina of the eye as two-dimensional images. The third dimension, depth, is projected as subtle differences between left and right retinal images. As early as the 1830s, stereoscopic depth perception was shown to depend on horizontal disparities between these images. To detect disparity, the visual system must match corresponding parts of the two retinal images. To identify the stimulus elements used in stereo matching, I applied a disparity-adaptation technique to visual patterns whose one-dimensional components and two-dimensional features have very different disparities. Surprisingly, the adaptors that are effective in altering depth perception appear widely separated in depth from the patterns they adapt. I conclude that stereo matching occurs in all directions of two-dimensional space and that one-dimensional components are the stimulus primitives, the fundamental elements of stereo matching. This is a reversal of the classical view of stereo correspondence as a one-dimensional (horizontal) matching of monocular two-dimensional features.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9790188     DOI: 10.1038/27192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  11 in total

1.  Motion in depth from interocular velocity differences revealed by differential motion aftereffect.

Authors:  Julian Martin Fernandez; Bart Farell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-12-13       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Seeing motion in depth using inter-ocular velocity differences.

Authors:  Julian Martin Fernandez; Bart Farell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Terminator disparity contributes to stereo matching for eye movements and perception.

Authors:  Christian Quaia; Lance M Optican; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The horizontal disparity direction vs. the stimulus disparity direction in the perception of the depth of two-dimensional patterns.

Authors:  Bart Farell; Yu-Chin Chai; Julian M Fernandez
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Orientation-specific computation in stereoscopic vision.

Authors:  Bart Farell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Temporal evolution of pattern disparity processing in humans.

Authors:  Christian Quaia; Boris M Sheliga; Lance M Optican; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Vertical binocular disparity is encoded implicitly within a model neuronal population tuned to horizontal disparity and orientation.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Effect of vertical disparities on depth representation in macaque monkeys: MT physiology and behavior.

Authors:  Syed A Chowdhury; Daniel L Christiansen; Michael L Morgan; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  From disparity to depth: how to make a grating and a plaid appear in the same depth plane.

Authors:  Yu-Chin Chai; Bart Farell
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Projected disparity, not horizontal disparity, predicts stereo depth of 1-D patterns.

Authors:  Bart Farell; Yu-Chin Chai; Julian M Fernandez
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.