K G Darrall1, J A Figgins. 1. Laboratory of the Government Chemist, Teddington, UK. kgd@lgc.co.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify the key parameters that influence smoke yields from roll-your-own (RYO) cigarettes and to compare smoke yields of cigarettes made under laboratory conditions with those made by habitual RYO consumers. DESIGN AND SETTING: One-way parametric variations in the laboratory-based production of RYO cigarettes complemented by a consumer survey conducted in a busy street at Romford, Essex, United Kingdom. SUBJECTS: 26 habitual RYO consumers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cigarette weights, puff numbers, and yields (carbon monoxide, nicotine, and tar). RESULTS: Smoke yields vary for specimen changes in weight of tobacco used, paper porosity, and the incorporation of a filter in the cigarette. Yields of cigarettes produced by 26 RYO smokers ranged from 9.9 to 21.0 mg tar per cigarette and from 0.9 to 1.8 mg nicotine per cigarette, and were generally lower than yields of laboratory-produced RYO cigarettes. CONCLUSIONS: Laboratory studies can provide useful information concerning the parameters that affect smoke yields of RYO cigarettes such as the incorporation of a filter to reduce yields. However, such studies must be complemented by surveys of cigarettes made by actual current RYO smokers. In one such investigation, it was found that the mean tar yields from cigarettes produced by 57% of the smokers were above the current maximum of 15 mg per cigarette for manufactured cigarettes. Currently 8% of manufactured cigarettes in the UK have a declared nicotine yield of greater than 1.1 mg per cigarette whereas 77% of RYO smokers produced cigarettes with a nicotine yield greater than this value.
OBJECTIVE: To identify the key parameters that influence smoke yields from roll-your-own (RYO) cigarettes and to compare smoke yields of cigarettes made under laboratory conditions with those made by habitual RYO consumers. DESIGN AND SETTING: One-way parametric variations in the laboratory-based production of RYO cigarettes complemented by a consumer survey conducted in a busy street at Romford, Essex, United Kingdom. SUBJECTS: 26 habitual RYO consumers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cigarette weights, puff numbers, and yields (carbon monoxide, nicotine, and tar). RESULTS: Smoke yields vary for specimen changes in weight of tobacco used, paper porosity, and the incorporation of a filter in the cigarette. Yields of cigarettes produced by 26 RYO smokers ranged from 9.9 to 21.0 mg tar per cigarette and from 0.9 to 1.8 mg nicotine per cigarette, and were generally lower than yields of laboratory-produced RYO cigarettes. CONCLUSIONS: Laboratory studies can provide useful information concerning the parameters that affect smoke yields of RYO cigarettes such as the incorporation of a filter to reduce yields. However, such studies must be complemented by surveys of cigarettes made by actual current RYO smokers. In one such investigation, it was found that the mean tar yields from cigarettes produced by 57% of the smokers were above the current maximum of 15 mg per cigarette for manufactured cigarettes. Currently 8% of manufactured cigarettes in the UK have a declared nicotine yield of greater than 1.1 mg per cigarette whereas 77% of RYO smokers produced cigarettes with a nicotine yield greater than this value.
Authors: Sarah Joseph; Nicolle M Krebs; Junjia Zhu; Yijin Wert; Reema Goel; Samantha M Reilly; Dongxiao Sun; John P Richie; Ivan Nikiforov; Pramil Cheriyath; Joshua E Muscat Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2018-04-07 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Valentina Minardi; Gianluigi Ferrante; Paolo D'Argenio; Maria Masocco; Lorenzo Spizzichino; Carla Bietta; Benedetta Contoli; Silvano Gallus Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2019-01-25 Impact factor: 3.380
Authors: Zachary R Rosenberry; Andrew A Strasser; Lauren L Canlas; Jennifer L Potts; Wallace B Pickworth Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2013-01-07 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Bartosz Koszowski; Zachary R Rosenberry; Lauren C Viray; Jennifer L Potts; Wallace B Pickworth Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2014-06-12 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: J Robert Branston; Ann McNeill; Anna B Gilmore; Rosemary Hiscock; Timea R Partos Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2018-10-06 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Silvano Gallus; Alessandra Lugo; Simone Ghislandi; Carlo La Vecchia; Anna B Gilmore Journal: Eur J Cancer Prev Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Marcela Fu; Jose M Martínez-Sánchez; Ramon Clèries; Joan R Villalbí; Richard A Daynard; Gregory N Connolly; Esteve Fernández Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2014-12-10 Impact factor: 2.692