INTRODUCTION: Despite a worldwide increase in the use of Make Your Own (MYO) cigarettes, there is little research characterizing MYO smokers in the United States and the cigarettes they make. METHODS: In a single laboratory visit, exclusive MYO smokers brought 5 MYO cigarettes they prepared at home, completed demographic and smoking history questionnaires, and prepared 25 cigarettes using their own tobacco and materials. RESULTS: Participants were mostly male (86.7%), average age of 41.3 years, and smoked an average of 19.5 (SD = 7.9) MYO cigarettes per day. They produced two types of cigarettes-by rolling tobacco in a paper leaf (Roll Your Own [RYO, n = 56]) and by injecting tobacco into a tube (Personal Machine Made [PMM, n = 42]). The PMM cigarettes were significantly larger than RYO cigarettes (p < .001). Home- (0.97 g) and laboratory-produced (0.95 g) PMM cigarettes did not differ by weight; however, the RYO cigarettes made at home (0.45 g) were slightly, but significantly, larger than those produced in the laboratory [0.43 g (p < .05)]. There was significant internal consistency in the weight of RYO and PMM cigarettes (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.82, 0.84, respectively). Time to produce RYO cigarettes (53 s/cigarette) was significantly longer than that of PMM cigarettes (42 s/cigarette) (p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: By using commercially available tobacco, tubes, and paper, experienced MYO smokers can quickly and consistently prepare cigarettes that may be useful in laboratory smoking topography and exposure experiments. Increasing the regulation of Factory Made (FM) cigarettes may lead to increased use of MYO cigarettes with unknown toxicant exposure and health risks to their consumers.
INTRODUCTION: Despite a worldwide increase in the use of Make Your Own (MYO) cigarettes, there is little research characterizing MYO smokers in the United States and the cigarettes they make. METHODS: In a single laboratory visit, exclusive MYO smokers brought 5 MYO cigarettes they prepared at home, completed demographic and smoking history questionnaires, and prepared 25 cigarettes using their own tobacco and materials. RESULTS:Participants were mostly male (86.7%), average age of 41.3 years, and smoked an average of 19.5 (SD = 7.9) MYO cigarettes per day. They produced two types of cigarettes-by rolling tobacco in a paper leaf (Roll Your Own [RYO, n = 56]) and by injecting tobacco into a tube (Personal Machine Made [PMM, n = 42]). The PMM cigarettes were significantly larger than RYO cigarettes (p < .001). Home- (0.97 g) and laboratory-produced (0.95 g) PMM cigarettes did not differ by weight; however, the RYO cigarettes made at home (0.45 g) were slightly, but significantly, larger than those produced in the laboratory [0.43 g (p < .05)]. There was significant internal consistency in the weight of RYO and PMM cigarettes (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.82, 0.84, respectively). Time to produce RYO cigarettes (53 s/cigarette) was significantly longer than that of PMM cigarettes (42 s/cigarette) (p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: By using commercially available tobacco, tubes, and paper, experienced MYO smokers can quickly and consistently prepare cigarettes that may be useful in laboratory smoking topography and exposure experiments. Increasing the regulation of Factory Made (FM) cigarettes may lead to increased use of MYO cigarettes with unknown toxicant exposure and health risks to their consumers.
Authors: David Young; Hua-Hie Yong; Ron Borland; Hana Ross; Buppha Sirirassamee; Foong Kin; David Hammond; Richard O'Connor; Geoffrey T Fong Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Sarah Joseph; Nicolle M Krebs; Junjia Zhu; Yijin Wert; Reema Goel; Samantha M Reilly; Dongxiao Sun; John P Richie; Ivan Nikiforov; Pramil Cheriyath; Joshua E Muscat Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2018-04-07 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Bartosz Koszowski; Zachary R Rosenberry; Lauren C Viray; Jennifer L Potts; Wallace B Pickworth Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2014-06-12 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Samantha M Reilly; Reema Goel; Neil Trushin; Zachary T Bitzer; Ryan J Elias; Joshua Muscat; John P Richie Journal: Chem Res Toxicol Date: 2018-11-28 Impact factor: 3.739
Authors: Abraham K Brown; Gera E Nagelhout; Bas van den Putte; Marc C Willemsen; Ute Mons; Romain Guignard; Mary E Thompson Journal: Tob Control Date: 2015-06-22 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: J Robert Branston; Ann McNeill; Anna B Gilmore; Rosemary Hiscock; Timea R Partos Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2018-10-06 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Silvano Gallus; Alessandra Lugo; Simone Ghislandi; Carlo La Vecchia; Anna B Gilmore Journal: Eur J Cancer Prev Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Timea R Partos; Anna B Gilmore; Sara C Hitchman; Rosemary Hiscock; J Robert Branston; Ann McNeill Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2018-05-03 Impact factor: 4.244