Literature DB >> 9789915

Sampling biases and missing data in explorations of sexual partner networks for the spread of sexually transmitted diseases.

A C Ghani1, C A Donnelly, G P Garnett.   

Abstract

The structures of sexual partner networks are important in determining patterns of transmission of STDs including HIV. Empirical data on sexual partnerships and sexual partner networks collected through sampling individuals are a non-random sample of partnerships and network structures even if individuals are sampled randomly. This has the potential to bias estimates of measures describing the sexual partner network. In addition, biases may be introduced through non-response and missing data. Using Monte Carlo simulation, we investigate the biases that are introduced in estimates measures of the sexual partner network through three common sampling methods. The results indicate that substantial systematic biases are introduced. The direction and magnitude of these biases suggest that, by ignoring them, the risk for the establishment and persistence of infection in a population may be underestimated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9789915     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980930)17:18<2079::aid-sim902>3.0.co;2-h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  28 in total

Review 1.  Methods and measures for the description of epidemiologic contact networks.

Authors:  C S Riolo; J S Koopman; S E Chick
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  Sexual networks and sexually transmitted infections: a tale of two cities.

Authors:  A M Jolly; S Q Muth; J L Wylie; J J Potterat
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.671

3.  Modeling dynamic and network heterogeneities in the spread of sexually transmitted diseases.

Authors:  Ken T D Eames; Matt J Keeling
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Reciprocal sex partner concurrency and STDs among heterosexuals at high-risk of HIV infection.

Authors:  Alan Neaigus; Samuel M Jenness; Holly Hagan; Christopher S Murrill; Travis Wendel
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.671

5.  Estimating the likely public health impact of partner notification for a clinical service: an evidence-based algorithm.

Authors:  Catherine H Mercer; Catherine R H Aicken; M Gary Brook; Claudia S Estcourt; Jackie A Cassell
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Toward an Understanding of Citywide Urban Environmental Governance: An Examination of Stewardship Networks in Baltimore and Seattle.

Authors:  Michele Romolini; J Morgan Grove; Curtis L Ventriss; Christopher J Koliba; Daniel H Krymkowski
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.266

7.  The transmission dynamics of gonorrhoea: modelling the reported behaviour of infected patients from Newark, New Jersey.

Authors:  G P Garnett; K J Mertz; L Finelli; W C Levine; M E St Louis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1999-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Egocentric network data provide additional information for characterizing an individual's HIV risk profile.

Authors:  André R S Périssé; Patricia Langenberg; Laura Hungerford; Marc Boulay; Man Charurat; Mauro Schechter; William Blattner
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2010-01-16       Impact factor: 4.177

9.  Empiricism and theorizing in epidemiology and social network analysis.

Authors:  Richard Rothenberg; Elizabeth Costenbader
Journal:  Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis       Date:  2010-11-25

10.  Timing of incident STI relative to sex partner change in young women.

Authors:  Mary A Ott; Jaroslaw Harezlak; Susan Ofner; J Dennis Fortenberry
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.830

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.