BACKGROUND: The variation in stroke volume and pulse pressure characteristic of atrial fibrillation is usually ascribed to time-dependent ventricular filling, implying a single positive relationship between end-systolic pressure and volume, which defines a single state of myocardial contractility. We tested the hypothesis that contractility also varies. METHODS AND RESULTS: We measured the left ventricular pressure and volume continuously with a conductance catheter with catheter-tip micromanometer introduced retrogradely into the left ventricle. The end-systolic pressure-volume relationship was determined in 6 patients in atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac catheterization for diagnostic purposes and 4 control patients in sinus rhythm undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The normal positive relationship between end-systolic pressure and volume was found in the control patients, but no such positive relationship was found in any patient in atrial fibrillation. In the latter, the slopes of the linear regressions were either not significantly different from zero or significantly negative (r values <0.08), both results indicating a change in contractility from beat to beat. Significantly negative relationships were found between end-systolic volume and preceding R-R interval (-0.82<r<-0.24), indicating the presence of mechanical restitution. Significantly positive relationships were found between end-systolic volume and the R-R interval before the preceding R-R interval (0.35<r<0.74), indicating the presence of postextrasystolic potentiation. CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial contractility is constantly changing from beat to beat in atrial fibrillation because of the influence of the force-interval relationships.
BACKGROUND: The variation in stroke volume and pulse pressure characteristic of atrial fibrillation is usually ascribed to time-dependent ventricular filling, implying a single positive relationship between end-systolic pressure and volume, which defines a single state of myocardial contractility. We tested the hypothesis that contractility also varies. METHODS AND RESULTS: We measured the left ventricular pressure and volume continuously with a conductance catheter with catheter-tip micromanometer introduced retrogradely into the left ventricle. The end-systolic pressure-volume relationship was determined in 6 patients in atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac catheterization for diagnostic purposes and 4 control patients in sinus rhythm undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The normal positive relationship between end-systolic pressure and volume was found in the control patients, but no such positive relationship was found in any patient in atrial fibrillation. In the latter, the slopes of the linear regressions were either not significantly different from zero or significantly negative (r values <0.08), both results indicating a change in contractility from beat to beat. Significantly negative relationships were found between end-systolic volume and preceding R-R interval (-0.82<r<-0.24), indicating the presence of mechanical restitution. Significantly positive relationships were found between end-systolic volume and the R-R interval before the preceding R-R interval (0.35<r<0.74), indicating the presence of postextrasystolic potentiation. CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial contractility is constantly changing from beat to beat in atrial fibrillation because of the influence of the force-interval relationships.
Authors: Stephen Pizzale; Robert Lemery; Martin S Green; Michael H Gollob; Anthony S L Tang; David H Birnie Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 5.223
Authors: Craig T January; L Samuel Wann; Joseph S Alpert; Hugh Calkins; Joaquin E Cigarroa; Joseph C Cleveland; Jamie B Conti; Patrick T Ellinor; Michael D Ezekowitz; Michael E Field; Katherine T Murray; Ralph L Sacco; William G Stevenson; Patrick J Tchou; Cynthia M Tracy; Clyde W Yancy Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: M Takagaki; P M McCarthy; M Chung; J Connor; R Dessoffy; Y Ochiai; M Howard; K Doi; M Kopcak; T N Mazgalev; K Fukamachi Journal: Heart Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 5.994