Literature DB >> 9785219

Dura mater maintains rat cranial sutures in vitro by regulating suture cell proliferation and collagen production.

L A Opperman1, A Chhabra, A A Nolen, Y Bao, R C Ogle.   

Abstract

Craniosynostosis, the premature osseous obliteration of cranial vault sutures, can result from mutations in genes encoding components of growth factor signaling systems or the extracellular matrix (ECM). Little is known of the capacity of osteoprogenitor cells of the cranial sutures to divide or to synthesize ECM in situ. Osteoblasts derived from patients with prematurely fused sutures were reported to express alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin at elevated levels, while proliferating at a rate comparable to control cells [DePollack et al., JBMR, 1996]; however, the suture osteoprogenitors, the population most likely to show proliferative abnormalities, were not present in the fused sutures used for this study. A model in which rat coronal sutures and associated bones develop normally in vitro, but in which sutures can be induced to fuse in the absence of dura mater, was used to examine cell proliferation and total protein synthesis in unfused sutures cultured in the presence of dura mater or in sutures induced to fuse in the absence of dura mater. Significantly increased cell proliferation was seen in suture cells prior to sutural obliteration, which returned to control levels as sutural fusion proceeded. Collagen synthesis in fusing sutures was elevated compared to non-fusing sutures and comparable to that seen in bone. Results indicated that in the absence of intercellular signals provided by the dura mater, suture cell proliferation increased initially, followed by increased synthesis of collagenous ECM within the suture and subsequent osseous obliteration of the suture. Thus factors originating in the dura mater affected suture cell proliferation and ECM production and were required for the maintenance of suture patency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9785219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol        ISSN: 0270-4145


  19 in total

1.  In vivo modulation of FGF biological activity alters cranial suture fate.

Authors:  J A Greenwald; B J Mehrara; J A Spector; S M Warren; P J Fagenholz; L E Smith; P J Bouletreau; F E Crisera; H Ueno; M T Longaker
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  Tissue interactions between craniosynostotic dura mater and bone.

Authors:  Gregory M Cooper; Emily L Durham; James J Cray; Michael I Siegel; Joseph E Losee; Mark P Mooney
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.046

Review 3.  Matrices and scaffolds for drug delivery in dental, oral and craniofacial tissue engineering.

Authors:  Eduardo K Moioli; Paul A Clark; Xuejun Xin; Shan Lal; Jeremy J Mao
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 15.470

4.  Relationship of brain and skull in pre- and postoperative sagittal synostosis.

Authors:  Kristina Aldridge; Alex A Kane; Jeffrey L Marsh; Peng Yan; Daniel Govier; Joan T Richtsmeier
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 5.  Mechanical influences on suture development and patency.

Authors:  Susan W Herring
Journal:  Front Oral Biol       Date:  2008

6.  Testing a novel nanofibre scaffold for utility in bone tissue regeneration.

Authors:  R Nicole Howie; Emily Durham; Brayden Oakes; Zachary Grey; Jason Smith; Phil Campbell; Amanda LaRue; Martin Steed; Robin Muise-Helmericks; James Cray
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 3.963

7.  Nanoparticulate mineralized collagen scaffolds induce in vivo bone regeneration independent of progenitor cell loading or exogenous growth factor stimulation.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Ren; Victor Tu; David Bischoff; Daniel W Weisgerber; Michael S Lewis; Dean T Yamaguchi; Timothy A Miller; Brendan A C Harley; Justine C Lee
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Central nervous system phenotypes in craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Kristina Aldridge; Jeffrey L Marsh; Daniel Govier; Joan T Richtsmeier
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.610

9.  Force-induced craniosynostosis in the murine sagittal suture.

Authors:  Adam J Oppenheimer; Samuel T Rhee; Steven A Goldstein; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Cell proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of growing pig cranial sutures.

Authors:  Zongyang Sun; Eugenia Lee; Susan W Herring
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2007-06-25       Impact factor: 2.610

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.