Literature DB >> 22627405

Tissue interactions between craniosynostotic dura mater and bone.

Gregory M Cooper1, Emily L Durham, James J Cray, Michael I Siegel, Joseph E Losee, Mark P Mooney.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cells within the dura mater have been implicated in the determination of suture patency and fusion. Craniosynostosis (CS), the premature fusion of 1 or more of the cranial sutures, could result from abnormal control over the differentiation of osteoprogenitor cells from the dura mater. This study tested whether dura mater cells derived from rabbits with congenital CS were different from cells derived from normal rabbits and investigated the effects that CS dura mater had on osteogenic differentiation in vitro and in vivo.
METHODS: Cells were derived from the dura mater from wild-type rabbits (WT; n = 23) or CS rabbits (n = 16). Cells were stimulated with bone morphogenetic protein 4, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) expression and cell proliferation were assessed. Dura mater-derived cells were also cocultured with primary rabbit bone-derived cells, and ALP was assessed. Finally, interactions between the dura mater and overlying tissues were manipulated in vivo.
RESULTS: Craniosynostotic dura mater-derived cells proliferated faster than did WT cells but were not more ALP positive. Coculture experiments showed that CS dura mater cells induced increased ALP activity in CS bone-derived cells, but not in WT bone-derived cells. In vivo experiments showed that a physical barrier successfully inhibited dura mater-derived osteogenesis.
CONCLUSIONS: Coculture of CS bone- and CS dura mater-derived cells evoked an abnormal phenotype in vitro. Covering the CS dura mater led to decreased bone formation in vivo. Further investigations will focus on the signaling molecules involved in the communication between these 2 CS tissue types in vitro and in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22627405      PMCID: PMC3360881          DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31824e645f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  37 in total

1.  Co-culture of osteoblasts with immature dural cells causes an increased rate and degree of osteoblast differentiation.

Authors:  Jason A Spector; Joshua A Greenwald; Stephen M Warren; Pierre J Bouletreau; Francesca E Crisera; Babak J Mehrara; Michael T Longaker
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Regional differentiation of rat cranial suture-derived dural cells is dependent on association with fusing and patent cranial sutures.

Authors:  B J Mehrara; J Greenwald; G S Chin; M Dudziak; J Sagrioglu; D S Steinbrech; P B Saadeh; G K Gittes; M T Longaker
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  The BMP antagonist noggin regulates cranial suture fusion.

Authors:  Stephen M Warren; Lisa J Brunet; Richard M Harland; Aris N Economides; Michael T Longaker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-04-10       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Biomolecular mechanisms of calvarial bone induction: immature versus mature dura mater.

Authors:  J A Greenwald; B J Mehrara; J A Spector; G S Chin; D S Steinbrech; P B Saadeh; J S Luchs; M F Paccione; G K Gittes; M T Longaker
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Cranial suture obliteration is induced by removal of transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta 3 activity and prevented by removal of TGF-beta 2 activity from fetal rat calvaria in vitro.

Authors:  L A Opperman; A Chhabra; R W Cho; R C Ogle
Journal:  J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol       Date:  1999 Jul-Sep

6.  Tissue interactions with underlying dura mater inhibit osseous obliteration of developing cranial sutures.

Authors:  L A Opperman; T M Sweeney; J Redmon; J A Persing; R C Ogle
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.780

7.  Correction of coronal suture synostosis using suture and dura mater allografts in rabbits with familial craniosynostosis.

Authors:  M P Mooney; A M Burrows; T D Smith; H W Losken; L A Opperman; J Dechant; A M Kreithen; R Kapucu; G M Cooper; R C Ogle; M I Siegel
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2001-05

8.  Regional differentiation of cranial suture-associated dura mater in vivo and in vitro: implications for suture fusion and patency.

Authors:  J A Greenwald; B J Mehrara; J A Spector; S M Warren; F E Crisera; P J Fagenholz; P J Bouletreau; M T Longaker
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Transforming growth factor-beta3 (Tgf-beta3) down-regulates Tgf-beta3 receptor type I (Tbetar-I) during rescue of cranial sutures from osseous obliteration.

Authors:  L A Opperman; V Galanis; A R Williams; K Adab
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Integration of FGF and TWIST in calvarial bone and suture development.

Authors:  D P Rice; T Aberg; Y Chan; Z Tang; P J Kettunen; L Pakarinen; R E Maxson; I Thesleff
Journal:  Development       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.868

View more
  8 in total

1.  Single-Cell Transcriptomic Analyses of the Developing Meninges Reveal Meningeal Fibroblast Diversity and Function.

Authors:  John DeSisto; Rebecca O'Rourke; Hannah E Jones; Bradley Pawlikowski; Alexandra D Malek; Stephanie Bonney; Fabien Guimiot; Kenneth L Jones; Julie A Siegenthaler
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 2.  Craniosynostosis: molecular pathways and future pharmacologic therapy.

Authors:  Kshemendra Senarath-Yapa; Michael T Chung; Adrian McArdle; Victor W Wong; Natalina Quarto; Michael T Longaker; Derrick C Wan
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 3.  Cranial neural crest cell contribution to craniofacial formation, pathology, and future directions in tissue engineering.

Authors:  Taylor Nicholas Snider; Yuji Mishina
Journal:  Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today       Date:  2014-09-16

4.  Novel use of cranial epidural space in rabbits as an animal model to investigate bone volume augmentation potential of different bone graft substitutes.

Authors:  Ivan Valdivia-Gandur; Wilfried Engelke; Víctor Beltrán; Eduardo Borie; Ramón Fuentes; María Cristina Manzanares-Céspedes
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.151

Review 5.  Living on the Edge of the CNS: Meninges Cell Diversity in Health and Disease.

Authors:  Julia Derk; Hannah E Jones; Christina Como; Bradley Pawlikowski; Julie A Siegenthaler
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 5.505

6.  Craniosynostosis-associated Fgfr2(C342Y) mutant bone marrow stromal cells exhibit cell autonomous abnormalities in osteoblast differentiation and bone formation.

Authors:  J Liu; T-G Kwon; H K Nam; N E Hatch
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  A review of hedgehog signaling in cranial bone development.

Authors:  Angel Pan; Le Chang; Alan Nguyen; Aaron W James
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Vertical osteoconductivity of sputtered hydroxyapatite-coated mini titanium implants after dura mater elevation: Rabbit calvarial model.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Osama Zakaria; Marwa Madi; Shohei Kasugai
Journal:  J Tissue Eng       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 7.813

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.