Literature DB >> 9784144

Comparison of rhabdomyosarcoma, buffalo green monkey kidney epithelial, A549 (human lung epithelial) cells and human embryonic lung fibroblasts for isolation of enteroviruses from clinical samples.

T W Kok1, T Pryor, L Payne.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, primary monkey kidney (PMK) epithelial cells have been one of the more widely used cell types for the isolation of enteroviruses from clinical samples. For the isolation of coxsackie A viruses, intraperitoneal inoculation of newborn mice has been used in some laboratories.
OBJECTIVE: With the discontinued availability of PMK epithelial cells and the reported growth of coxsackie A viruses in rhabdomyosarcoma cells (RD), we compared the use of the latter cell line with our routinely used microwell cell cultures. STUDY
DESIGN: Microwell cell cultures of buffalo green monkey epithelial cell line (BGM), human lung carcinoma epithelial cell line (A549) and human embryonic lung (HEL) fibroblasts were compared with RD cell line for the isolation of enteroviruses from clinical samples.
RESULTS: A total of 39 enteroviruses was isolated from 3517 specimens. The HEL fibroblasts yielded 28 (72%) enteroviruses, followed by A549 (25 isolates, 64%), BGM (23 isolates, 59%) and RD cells (18 isolates, 46%).
CONCLUSIONS: All isolates which grew in RD cells showed specific cytopathic effects in one or more of the other inoculated cell cultures. Quantitative determinations (TCID50) with five different enteroviruses showed that the HEL fibroblasts and RD cell line to be the most sensitive cell types, followed by BGM and A549 cell lines. However, integrity of the inoculated cell monolayers was best with HEL fibroblasts and A549 cells but morphology was not optimal with RD cells during the incubation period of 14 days.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9784144     DOI: 10.1016/s0928-0197(98)00026-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Virol        ISSN: 1386-6532            Impact factor:   3.168


  14 in total

1.  Comparison of the NucliSens Basic kit (Nucleic Acid Sequence-Based Amplification) and the Argene Biosoft Enterovirus Consensus Reverse Transcription-PCR assays for rapid detection of enterovirus RNA in clinical specimens.

Authors:  Marie L Landry; Robin Garner; David Ferguson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Rapid enterovirus RNA detection in clinical specimens by using nucleic acid sequence-based amplification.

Authors:  Marie L Landry; Robin Garner; David Ferguson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Viral kinetics of enterovirus 71 in human abdomyosarcoma cells.

Authors:  Jing Lu; Ya-Qing He; Li-Na Yi; Hong Zan; Hsiang-Fu Kung; Ming-Liang He
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Use of cell culture-PCR assay based on combination of A549 and BGMK cell lines and molecular identification as a tool to monitor infectious adenoviruses and enteroviruses in river water.

Authors:  Cheonghoon Lee; Seung-Hoon Lee; Euiri Han; Sang-Jong Kim
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  Role of cell culture for virus detection in the age of technology.

Authors:  Diane S Leland; Christine C Ginocchio
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 6.  Virological and Immunological Outcomes of Coinfections.

Authors:  Naveen Kumar; Shalini Sharma; Sanjay Barua; Bhupendra N Tripathi; Barry T Rouse
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 26.132

7.  Gene transduction and cell entry pathway of fiber-modified adenovirus type 5 vectors carrying novel endocytic peptide ligands selected on human tracheal glandular cells.

Authors:  Florence Gaden; Laure Franqueville; Maria K Magnusson; Saw See Hong; Marc D Merten; Leif Lindholm; Pierre Boulanger
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.103

8.  Molecular detection and characterization of human enteroviruses in Korean surface water.

Authors:  Gyucheol Lee; Chanhee Lee
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2008-07-05       Impact factor: 3.422

9.  Nonsusceptibility of primate cells to Taura syndrome virus.

Authors:  Carlos R Pantoja; Solangel A Navarro; Jaime Naranjo; Donald V Lightner; Charles P Gerba
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Taura syndrome virus and mammalian cell lines.

Authors:  Peng Luo; Chao-Qun Hu; Chun-Hua Ren; Zhao-Feng Sun
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.