Literature DB >> 9783550

Bone mineral and body composition measurements: cross-calibration of pencil-beam and fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers.

K J Ellis1, R J Shypailo.   

Abstract

Pencil-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers (DXA) are being replaced with instruments that rely solely on fan-beam technology. However, information has been lacking regarding the translation of bone mineral and body composition data between the two devices. We have compared total body scans using pencil-beam (Hologic QDR-2000W) and fan-beam (Hologic QDR-4500A) instruments for 33 children (ages 3-18 years) and 14 adults. Bone mineral content (BMC), bone mineral density (BMD), fat, lean, and body fatness (%fat) values were highly correlated (r2 = 0.984-0.998) between the two DXA instruments. The mean differences between the paired measurements were: deltaBMC = 7.5 +/- 73.6 g, deltaBMD = 0.0074 +/- 0.0252 g/cm2, delta lean = 1.05 +/- 1.8 kg, delta fat = -0.77 +/- 1.7 kg, and delta%fat = -0.94% +/- 2.5%. The BMC and BMD values were not statistically different, whereas the differences for the body composition values were significant (p < 0.02-0.005). Regression equations are provided for conversion of bone and body composition data between pencil-beam and fan-beam values for the whole body. To test the performance of these equations for a second group (23 subjects), predicted values were compared with the measured data obtained using the fan-beam instrument. The mean differences were -1.0% to 1.4%, except for body fat mass, where the difference was 6.4%. For cross-sectional studies, the two DXA technologies can be considered equivalent after using the translational equations provided. For longitudinal studies in which small changes in body composition for the individual are to be detected, we recommend that the same DXA instrument be used whenever possible. For example, transition from a pencil-beam to a fan-beam instrument could, in extreme cases, result in differences as large as 19% for the estimate of body fat mass.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9783550     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.10.1613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  19 in total

1.  Pediatric in vivo cross-calibration between the GE Lunar Prodigy and DPX-L bone densitometers.

Authors:  Nicola J Crabtree; N J Shaw; C M Boivin; B Oldroyd; J G Truscott
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Estimates of body fat in children by Hologic QDR-2000 and QDR-4500A dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers compared with deuterium dilution.

Authors:  Delphine R Robotham; Dale A Schoeller; Arlene B Mercado; Margaret C Mirch; Kelly R Theim; James C Reynolds; Jack A Yanovski
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.839

3.  Comparison of 3 body size descriptors in critically ill obese children and adolescents: implications for medication dosing.

Authors:  Emma L Ross; Jennifer Jorgensen; Peter E DeWitt; Carol Okada; Renee Porter; Matthew Haemer; Pamela D Reiter
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-04

Review 4.  The multidomain mobility lab in older persons: from bench to bedside. The assessment of body composition in older persons at risk of mobility limitations.

Authors:  Andrea P Rossi; Tamara B Harris; Francesco Fantin; Fabio Armellini; Mauro Zamboni
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.116

5.  Comparison of BMD precision for Prodigy and Delphi spine and femur scans.

Authors:  J A Shepherd; B Fan; Y Lu; E M Lewiecki; P Miller; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Calcium acquisition rates do not support age-appropriate gains in total body bone mineral content in prepuberty and late puberty in girls with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  K J Schulze; C Cutchins; B J Rosenstein; E L Germain-Lee; K O O'Brien
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Vitamin D deficiency and whole-body and femur bone mass relative to weight in healthy newborns.

Authors:  Hope Weiler; Shirley Fitzpatrick-Wong; Rebecca Veitch; Heather Kovacs; Jeannine Schellenberg; Ursula McCloy; Chui Kin Yuen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Is body mass index a useful measure of excess body fatness in adolescents and young adults with Down syndrome?

Authors:  L G Bandini; R K Fleming; R Scampini; J Gleason; A Must
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2012-09-14

9.  The abilities of body mass index and skinfold thicknesses to identify children with low or elevated levels of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-determined body fatness.

Authors:  David S Freedman; Cynthia L Ogden; Heidi M Blanck; Lori G Borrud; William H Dietz
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 4.406

10.  Bone mineral density in pseudohypoparathyroidism type 1a.

Authors:  Dominique N Long; Michael A Levine; Emily L Germain-Lee
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 5.958

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.