OBJECTIVE: To compare the degrees of ventilator-induced lung injury caused by two ventilation protocols. DESIGN: Randomized trial. SETTING: University animal laboratory. SUBJECTS: Sixteen New Zealand white rabbits. INTERVENTIONS: After five sequential saline lung lavages, eight pairs of anesthetized rabbits were allocated randomly to receive either of two ventilation protocols for 4 hrs during neuromuscular blockade. Both groups received 3 cm H2O of positive end-expiratory pressure and 100% oxygen. Control group animals received an estimated tidal volume of 12 mL/kg, an inspiratory time of 0.7 sec, and a ventilatory rate adjusted for a PaCO2 of 35 to 45 torr (4.7 to 6 kPa). Study group animals were ventilated through an intratracheal catheter, with inspiratory time of 1.5 secs, ventilatory rate of 20 breaths/min, and peak inspiratory pressure of 4 to 8 cm H2O, adjusted to maintain PaCO2 at 150 to 250 torr (20 to 33 kPa). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Arterial blood gases were measured every 30 mins. After 4 hrs, a final lung lavage was performed. Physiologic parameters, cell counts and protein concentration in the final lavage, and lung histology were compared between groups. The alveolar-arterial oxygen tension gradient was higher in the study group over the first 1.5 hrs, but the time profile showed significantly (p = .001) greater improvement in the study group. After 4 hrs, the mean alveolar-arterial oxygen tension gradient was lower in the study group (94 torr [12.5 kPa] vs. 201 torr [26.8 kPa]). The increase in neutrophil count from the initial to the final lung lavage was lower in the study group (0.27 x 10(7) cells/L vs. 2.01 x 10(7) cells/L, p = .037), as was the absolute value of the neutrophil count in the final lavage (1.33 x 10(7) cells/L vs. 3.02 x 10(7) cells/L, p = .04). The median hyaline membrane score was lower in the study group (0.5 vs. 3.0) but the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that a very low tidal volume reduces ventilator-induced lung injury in saline-lavaged rabbits during ventilation at low lung volume.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the degrees of ventilator-induced lung injury caused by two ventilation protocols. DESIGN: Randomized trial. SETTING: University animal laboratory. SUBJECTS: Sixteen New Zealand white rabbits. INTERVENTIONS: After five sequential saline lung lavages, eight pairs of anesthetized rabbits were allocated randomly to receive either of two ventilation protocols for 4 hrs during neuromuscular blockade. Both groups received 3 cm H2O of positive end-expiratory pressure and 100% oxygen. Control group animals received an estimated tidal volume of 12 mL/kg, an inspiratory time of 0.7 sec, and a ventilatory rate adjusted for a PaCO2 of 35 to 45 torr (4.7 to 6 kPa). Study group animals were ventilated through an intratracheal catheter, with inspiratory time of 1.5 secs, ventilatory rate of 20 breaths/min, and peak inspiratory pressure of 4 to 8 cm H2O, adjusted to maintain PaCO2 at 150 to 250 torr (20 to 33 kPa). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Arterial blood gases were measured every 30 mins. After 4 hrs, a final lung lavage was performed. Physiologic parameters, cell counts and protein concentration in the final lavage, and lung histology were compared between groups. The alveolar-arterial oxygen tension gradient was higher in the study group over the first 1.5 hrs, but the time profile showed significantly (p = .001) greater improvement in the study group. After 4 hrs, the mean alveolar-arterial oxygen tension gradient was lower in the study group (94 torr [12.5 kPa] vs. 201 torr [26.8 kPa]). The increase in neutrophil count from the initial to the final lung lavage was lower in the study group (0.27 x 10(7) cells/L vs. 2.01 x 10(7) cells/L, p = .037), as was the absolute value of the neutrophil count in the final lavage (1.33 x 10(7) cells/L vs. 3.02 x 10(7) cells/L, p = .04). The median hyaline membrane score was lower in the study group (0.5 vs. 3.0) but the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that a very low tidal volume reduces ventilator-induced lung injury in saline-lavaged rabbits during ventilation at low lung volume.
Authors: Ingo Schwartges; Lothar A Schwarte; Artur Fournell; Thomas W L Scheeren; Olaf Picker Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2008-06-25 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Jérôme Allardet-Servent; Matthias Castanier; Thomas Signouret; Rettinavelou Soundaravelou; Anne Lepidi; Jean-Marie Seghboyan Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 7.598