Literature DB >> 9779532

Increase in sick leave rates caused by back pain among pregnant Swedish women after amelioration of social benefits. A paradox.

A Sydsjö1, G Sydsjö, B Wijma.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective population study.
OBJECTIVES: To explore whether the increase in social benefits for pregnant women introduced in Sweden between 1978 and in 1986 was associated with a decrease in the use of sick leave caused by back pain during the same period. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Back pain is a common condition among Swedish pregnant women. It may be regarded as a normal discomfort of pregnancy, because at least 50% of pregnant women experience back pain to some extent during pregnancy.
METHODS: Participants were women consecutively delivered in 1978 (n = 1524) and in 1986 (n = 1688). Between these two time points, the number of offered days of parental benefit increased and a new benefit, the pregnancy benefit, was introduced. Data were collected from the antenatal care and delivery records and from pregnant women's social insurance files.
RESULTS: From 1978 to 1986 the use of sick leave because of back pain during pregnancy increased. The number of pregnant women granted sick leave employed pregnant women because of back pain increased from 11% in 1978 to 29% in 1986 (P < 0.001). The sick leave rate increased in most occupations and especially among young women.
CONCLUSIONS: The Swedish society has provided ample social benefits to allow the pregnant woman to take leave from work, without having to be labeled as "ill," because of normal conditions such as back pain during pregnancy. Instead of an expected decrease in sick leave because of back pain during pregnancy, an increase was observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9779532     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199809150-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  5 in total

1.  Auricular acupuncture as a treatment for pregnant women who have low back and posterior pelvic pain: a pilot study.

Authors:  Shu-Ming Wang; Peggy Dezinno; Eric C Lin; Haiqun Lin; James J Yue; Michael R Berman; Ferne Braveman; Zeev N Kain
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Impact of postpartum lumbopelvic pain on disability, pain intensity, health-related quality of life, activity level, kinesiophobia, and depressive symptoms.

Authors:  Annelie Gutke; Mari Lundberg; Hans Christian Östgaard; Birgitta Öberg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Effects of a weight-gain restriction programme for obese pregnant women on sickness absence and pregnancy benefits.

Authors:  Gunilla Sydsjö; Wiktor Gustafsson Monfils; Nicholas de Keyser; Ing-Marie Claesson; Adam Sydsjö; Ann Josefsson
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 2.581

4.  Pregnancy-related low back pain and pelvic girdle pain approximately 14 months after pregnancy - pain status, self-rated health and family situation.

Authors:  Cecilia Bergström; Margareta Persson; Ingrid Mogren
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-01-25       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Risk Factors Associated with Low Back Pain among A Group of 1510 Pregnant Women.

Authors:  Aleksandra Bryndal; Marian Majchrzycki; Agnieszka Grochulska; Sebastian Glowinski; Agnieszka Seremak-Mrozikiewicz
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2020-06-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.