Literature DB >> 20593205

Impact of postpartum lumbopelvic pain on disability, pain intensity, health-related quality of life, activity level, kinesiophobia, and depressive symptoms.

Annelie Gutke1, Mari Lundberg, Hans Christian Östgaard, Birgitta Öberg.   

Abstract

The majority of women recover from pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain within 3 months of delivery. Since biomechanical and hormonal changes from pregnancy are largely reversed by 3 months postpartum, consequently, it is assumed that other factors might interfere with recovery. Relative to the fear-avoidance model and with reference to previous studies, we chose to investigate some pre-decided factors to understand persistent lumbopelvic pain. The evaluation of lumbopelvic pain postpartum is mostly based on self-administered questionnaires or interviews. Clinical classification of the lumbopelvic pain may increase our knowledge about postpartum subgroups. Two hundred and seventy-two consecutively registered pregnant women evaluated at 3 months postpartum, answered questionnaires concerning disability (Oswestry disability index), pain intensity on visual analog scale, health-related quality of life (HRQL, EQ5D), activity level, depressive symptoms (Edinburgh postnatal Depression Scale) and kinesiophobia (Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia). Women were classified into lumbopelvic pain subgroups according to mechanical assessment of the lumbar spine, pelvic pain provocation tests, standard history, and pain drawings. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to explain the variance of disability. Thirty-three percent of postpartum women were classified with lumbopelvic pain; 40% reported moderate to severe disability. The impacts were similar among subgroups. Pain intensity, HRQL and kinesiophobia explained 53% of postpartum disability due to lumbopelvic pain. In conclusion, one of three postpartum women still had some lumbopelvic pain and the impacts were equivalent irrespective of symptoms in lumbar or pelvic areas. The additional explanations of variance in disability by HRQL and kinesiophobia were minor, suggesting that pain intensity was the major contributing factor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20593205      PMCID: PMC3048223          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-010-1487-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  31 in total

Review 1.  The Oswestry Disability Index.

Authors:  J C Fairbank; P B Pynsent
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Swedish population health-related quality of life results using the EQ-5D.

Authors:  K Burström; M Johannesson; F Diderichsen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group.

Authors:  R Rabin; F de Charro
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.709

4.  Health-related quality of life and physical ability among pregnant women with and without back pain in late pregnancy.

Authors:  Christina Olsson; Lena Nilsson-Wikmar
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  Musculoskeletal pain in the Netherlands: prevalences, consequences and risk groups, the DMC(3)-study.

Authors:  H S J Picavet; J S A G Schouten
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  Clinical course in patients seeking primary care for back or neck pain: a prospective 5-year follow-up of outcome and health care consumption with subgroup analysis.

Authors:  Paul Enthoven; Elisabeth Skargren; Birgitta Oberg
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Comparison of classification-based physical therapy with therapy based on clinical practice guidelines for patients with acute low back pain: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Julie M Fritz; Anthony Delitto; Richard E Erhard
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Lumbar back and posterior pelvic pain during pregnancy: a 3-year follow-up.

Authors:  Lotta Norén; Solveig Ostgaard; Gun Johansson; Hans C Ostgaard
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2001-12-08       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  The efficacy of a treatment program focusing on specific stabilizing exercises for pelvic girdle pain after pregnancy: a two-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Britt Stuge; Marit Bragelien Veierød; Even Laerum; Nina Vøllestad
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The inter-rater reliability of a standardised classification system for pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain.

Authors:  Annelie Gutke; Gunilla Kjellby-Wendt; Birgitta Oberg
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2009-07-25
View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  Psychological factors in chronic pelvic pain in women: relevance and application of the fear-avoidance model of pain.

Authors:  Meryl J Alappattu; Mark D Bishop
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2011-08-11

2.  Cross-cultural adaptation of the Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire (PGQ) into Brazilian Portuguese and clinimetric testing of the PGQ and Roland Morris questionnaire in pregnancy pelvic pain.

Authors:  Francine Mendonça de Luna Fagundes; Cristina Maria Nunes Cabral
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  The relationship between diastasis rectus abdominus, pelvic floor trauma and function in primiparous women postpartum.

Authors:  Vered H Eisenberg; Lee Sela; Asaf Weisman; Youssef Masharawi
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Stabilization exercise affects function of transverse abdominis and pelvic floor muscles in women with postpartum lumbo-pelvic pain: a double-blinded randomized clinical trial study.

Authors:  Fatemeh Ehsani; Nasrin Sahebi; Sanaz Shanbehzadeh; Amir Massoud Arab; Shabnam ShahAli
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Fatigability of the Lumbopelvic Stabilizing Muscles in Women 8 and 26 Weeks Postpartum.

Authors:  Rita E Deering; Jonathon Senefeld; Tatyana Pashibin; Donald A Neumann; Meredith Cruz; Sandra K Hunter
Journal:  J Womens Health Phys Therap       Date:  2018 Sep-Dec

6.  Chiropractic Management of Pregnancy-Related Lumbopelvic Pain: A Case Study.

Authors:  Maria Bernard; Peter Tuchin
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-05-25

7.  A Systematic Review of Quality of Life Measures in Pregnant and Postpartum Mothers.

Authors:  Mulubrhan F Mogos; Euna M August; Abraham A Salinas-Miranda; Dawood H Sultan; Hamisu M Salihu
Journal:  Appl Res Qual Life       Date:  2013-06-01

8.  Subjective recovery from pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain the first 6 weeks after delivery: a prospective longitudinal cohort study.

Authors:  Anne Marie Gausel; Stefan Malmqvist; Knut Andersen; Inger Kjærmann; Jan Petter Larsen; Ingvild Dalen; Inger Økland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Adverse events from spinal manipulations in the pregnant and postpartum periods: a systematic review and update.

Authors:  Carol Ann Weis; Kent Stuber; Kent Murnaghan; Shari Wynd
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2021-04

10.  Impaired Trunk Flexor Strength, Fatigability, and Steadiness in Postpartum Women.

Authors:  Rita E Deering; Meredith Cruz; Jonathon W Senefeld; Tatyana Pashibin; Sarah Eickmeyer; Sandra K Hunter
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2018-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.